Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 38me0086 (posted Jul. 18, 2000)"
June 28, 2000
Letters to the Editor
NAME OF NEWSPAPER
ADDRESS
To The Editor:
Ron Woodward’s letter
(“It’s illegal, after all,” June 26) missed the opportunity to debate the
real issue: that America’s highly regulated immigration system has become
unworkable largely because it is outdated. As currently structured, it does not
reflect the current needs and realities of American families and businesses, and
places families, employers and employees in a bureaucratic morass of regulations
and red tape that means years of frustration.
For instance, the current
immigration policy does not help with employment-based immigration. Yet, as
numerous independent economic studies over the past three years have noted, the
U.S. is in the midst of at least a 20-year-long worker shortage. As a result,
our need for employees from other countries is higher than at any time since
World War II. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan recently told Congress
that the nation’s labor shortage is “the greatest threat” to our
record-long economic expansion. As a recent Federal Reserve study noted:
“Immigrant labor has been an integral part of the economic boom.”
Further, immigrants, even
undocumented immigrants, provide needed economic benefits for all Americans. A
recent economic study found that “immigrants free up natives” from
lower-paying jobs, allowing the skill and income level of American workers to
rise. The study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas also found that: “The
more different immigrants are, regardless of whether they have lower or higher
skills than natives, the bigger the economic gains.” Consumers, for example,
benefit directly from immigration when they consume goods and services produced
by immigrants. Many inner-city neighborhoods are being revived by immigrant
enclaves, the increase in immigrant-owned businesses and greater demand for
housing.
Even more importantly for the
long-term economic benefit of all current American workers, immigrants help
maintain the solvency of pay-as-you-go retirement programs such as Social
Security and Medicare. The reason is simple: immigrants are over-represented in
the 10-34 age range. This influx of younger, working age people expands the
labor force at precisely the same time as workers who were born during the
post-World War II baby boom are retiring or getting ready to retire. As a
result, immigrants slow the ongoing decline in the ratio of workers to retirees.
These facts should be
acknowledged before anyone unwisely draws a hard line in the sand against
immigrants.
Sincerely,
Jack Pinnix
38me0086