Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 99110413 (posted Nov. 4, 1999)"
|
For
Immediate Release
Monday, November 1, 1999
|
Contact:
Matthew Tallmer
Public Affairs Manager
Office: 202-216-2404
Fax:
202-371-9449
mtallmer@aila.org |
Congress Needs to Move on Immigration Issues:
Adequate
Funding for Services; Late Amnesty Equitable Relief;
WASHINGTON –
President Clinton and Congress need to address several key immigration issues
before Congress recesses, according to the American Immigration Lawyers
Association (AILA).
“Between now and the
2000 elections, we will be focusing on our priority issues. We call on the
President and lawmakers of both parties to join us, and send a pro-immigrant
message to the millions of new citizens and voters who care about immigrants,”
said Jeanne Butterfield, AILA’s Executive Director. “Before Congress
adjourns, we urge them to adequately fund INS services that support the national
interest, allow potential immigrants their day in court, and treat all
immigrants equally. For the long-term, we call upon Congress to amend the overly
harsh 1996 immigration laws.”
Adequate
Funding.Currently, immigration benefits and services (adjudications) are funded
through user fees. Approximately $300 million of user fees in recent years have
gone for such non-adjudications projects as inspector general investigations,
enforcement, and upgrading the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s
computers. The multi-million-dollar diversions are one reason the INS has a huge
adjudications backlog.
“The only way to
ensure that refugees can enter the U.S., that people can be naturalized, can
reunite with their families, and that businesses can hire needed workers without
inordinate delays is for Congress to support adjudications with appropriated
funds and user fees. While the current budget sets aside $124 million for INS
services, that isn’t nearly enough. We call upon the Administration and
Congress to fully and adequately fund naturalization and other adjudications,”
Butterfield said.
Late
Amnesty. A 1986 law was designed to allow some 3 million long-term resident
immigrants living in the U.S. to obtain legal status. The INS gave people,
including AILA members, misleading and mistaken information about who the law
covered. A federal court ordered the INS to accept and evaluate nearly 350,000
applications. Congress intervened in 1996 and stripped federal court
jurisdiction in these so-called “late amnesty” cases.
“Congress should
step up to the plate and correct the injustice it committed three years ago. We
urge President Clinton and lawmakers to restore court jurisdiction, and to allow
the INS to finally process the 350,000 applications that should have been
accepted and adjudicated more than a decade ago,” Butterfield said.
Treat
All Equally. The issue of
equitable relief arose because Congress enacted several changes in immigration
law providing differing levels of benefits and relief from deportation for
different refugees from Central America, Haiti, Cuba, and the former Soviet
Union. “It makes no sense to give certain refugees a green card,
while forcing other equally deserving groups to undergo further interminable
court proceedings in order to try to win protection,” Butterfield said. “We
should provide just and equitable relief for all refugees, regardless of their
particular country of origin.”
In the long-term,
Butterfield reiterated, AILA urges Congress to revisit the overly harsh 1996
immigration laws. “As some Congressmen who supported these laws now realize,
the 1996 laws violate key American principles of law, justice, fairness, and
family values; they went too far, and must be changed to restore the balance.”
38me9069