AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20111735 | Dated November 19, 2020 | File Size: 1795 KDownload the Document
DHS notice of proposed rulemaking which would eliminate employment authorization eligibility for individuals who have final orders of removal but are temporarily released from custody on an order of supervision. The proposed rule contains an exception to continue to allow employment authorization for individuals for whom DHS has determined that removal is impracticable because all countries from whom travel documents have been requested have affirmatively declined to issue a travel document and who establish economic necessity. Comments are due 12/21/20, with comments on associated form revisions due 1/19/21. (85 FR 74196, 11/19/20)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 106, 241 and 274a
[CIS No. 2653–19; DHS Docket No. USCIS– 2019–0024]
Employment Authorization for Certain Classes of Aliens With Final Orders of Removal
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20111735.Open the Document
Track selected proposed and promulgated changes to immigration-related regulations and the current status of each change made during the last two years of the Trump administration.Track Changes Now
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.