AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20040231 | Dated June 15, 2020
AILA provides responses to some frequently asked questions regarding the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and its impact on public charge inadmissibility determinations. This document will be updated as more questions about COVID-19 and the public charge rule arise.
1. Will getting tested, treatment or preventative care for COVID-19 impact my client’s immigration application under the public charge rule?
On March 13, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the agency will not consider “testing, treatment, nor preventative care (including vaccines, if a vaccine becomes available) related to COVID-19” as part of a public-charge determination, nor as related to the public benefit condition applicable to certain nonimmigrants seeking an extension of stay or change of status, even if such treatment is provided or paid for by one or more public benefits (e.g., federally funded Medicaid). USCIS is encouraging anyone with symptoms that resemble COVID-19 (e.g., fever, cough, shortness of breath) to seek necessary medical treatment or preventive services. USCIS has indicated that such treatment or preventive service “will not negatively affect any alien as part of a future public charge analysis.”
2. Will obtaining unemployment insurance impact my client’s immigration application under the public charge rule?
Unemployment insurance payments are not generally taken into consideration by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for purposes of making a public charge determination. As DHS explained in its final rule on inadmissibility on public charge grounds, “DHS would not consider federal and state retirement, Social Security retirement benefits, Social Security Disability, post secondary education, and unemployment benefits as public benefits under the public charge inadmissibility determination as these are considered to be earned benefits through the person’s employment and specific tax deductions.” In addition, USCIS indicates in Volume 8, Part G, Chapter 10 of the USCIS Policy Manual that unemployment benefits are not considered by USCIS in a public charge inadmissibility determination as unemployment insurance is considered by USCIS as an “earned” benefit. For a non-exhaustive list of other public benefits that USCIS does not consider in the public charge inadmissibility determination, please see Volume 8, Part G, Chapter 10 of the USCIS Policy Manual.
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has not confirmed whether treatment or care related to COVID-19 will be considered as part of its public charge totality of the circumstances analysis. Moreover, the DOS Interim Final Rule and the Foreign Affairs Manual do not directly address the issue of how unemployment benefits will impact public charge determinations made by consular officers at U.S. consulates overseas. AILA's DOS Liaison Committee is seeking clarification from DOS regarding how consular officers will factor in unemployment insurance compensation in public charge determinations at U.S. consulates overseas.
3. Will receiving a recovery rebate under the CARES Act impact my client’s immigration application under the public charge rule?
On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, a $2 trillion dollar economic recovery package. The package offers relief to state and local governments, individuals, small and large businesses, and hospitals affected by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. In particular, the CARES Act provides for the issuance of one-time payments, called recovery rebates, (or commonly known as “stimulus checks”) to help individuals recover from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible individuals with an adjusted gross income up to $75,000 can receive a one-time payment of $1,200. Married couples filing a joint tax return are eligible to receive a payment of $2,400, as long as their adjusted gross income is less than $150,000. Eligible individuals can also receive an additional $500 for each eligible child under the age of 17.
The recovery rebates are structured as automatically advanced tax credits to be disbursed by the Treasury Department. The DHS final rule on inadmissibility on public charge grounds is clear that tax credits are not taken into account for the purpose of a public charge determination. DHS indicates in its final rule that only public benefits as defined in 8 CFR 212.21(b) will be considered in the public charge inadmissibility determination. 8 CFR 212.21(b) defines a public benefit to include means-tested programs like Medicaid and cash assistance for income maintenance, however 8 CFR 212.21(b) indicates that cash assistance for income maintenance does not include tax credits. Furthermore, USCIS indicates in Volume 8, Part G, Chapter 10 of the USCIS Policy Manual that tax credits are not considered public benefits in a public charge inadmissibility determination.
Similarly, the Department of State (DOS) Interim Final Rule and the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) align with the DHS final rule in that the DOS interim final rule and FAM indicate that for the purposes of defining “public benefit”, cash assistance for income maintenance does not include tax credits. AILA's DOS Liaison Committee is seeking additional clarification from DOS regarding how consular officers will factor in tax credits in public charge determinations at U.S. consulates overseas.
For additional information regarding the recovery rebates provided under the CARES Act, please see AILA Practice Alert: Is My Immigration Client Eligible for a Recovery Rebate under the CARES Act?
4. Will receiving Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer (P-EBT) impact my client’s immigration application under the public charge rule?*
Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer (P-EBT) provides nutritional resources to families who have lost access to free or reduced-price school meals due to school closures due to COVID-19. Families will receive money on a new or existing EBT card to help fill the school meals gap. The average benefit is $5.70/day per student, retroactive to when school initially closed. In most states, families of eligible children will automatically receive a P-EBT card in the mail or those benefits will be loaded on to existing EBT cards. In some states, families may need to proactively apply for a P-EBT card to receive benefits. Even though P-EBT may be provided on the same card that families use to access SNAP benefits, P-EBT is not SNAP.
As DHS explained in its final rule on inadmissibility on public charge grounds, school meal programs are not considered public benefits under the public charge inadmissibility determination. In addition, USCIS indicates in Volume 8, Part G, Chapter 10 of the USCIS Policy Manual that “benefits through school lunch or other supplemental nutrition programs” are not considered by USCIS in a public charge inadmissibility determination. Since the P-EBT program has been introduced, states have received clarification in writing from USDA that Pandemic EBT will not be considered in the public charge inadmissibility determination.
Pandemic EBT is available regardless of immigration status to any student who was receiving free or reduced-price meals at school. For many immigrant families who have been excluded from unemployment assistance and stimulus checks, P-EBT may be the only new resource available to help them weather this challenging time. We encourage immigration practitioners to make clients aware of this program and to clarify that using P-EBT benefits will not impact a parent or child's immigration status.
*Special thanks to the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) for their analysis of this issue.
For more information regarding the public charge final rule which became effective February 24, 2020, please see AILA’s Featured Issue page:
For the latest information and guidance on how federal agencies are operating in response to COVID-19, please see AILA’s Resource Center:
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20040231.
On March 9, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the pending appeal in DHS v. New York et. al. and the Seventh Circuit also dismissed the government’s appeal in Cook County, et al. v. Wolf, et al. As a result of these decisions, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois’s order vacating the 2019 public charge final rule nationwide went into effect.
Subsequently, DHS withdrew its 2019 public charge rule, and USCIS stopped applying the rule to all pending applications and petitions. The DOS public charge rule was enjoined in July 2020, and, in December 2020, DOJ withdrew its public charge rule from OIRA.
Visit the public charge featured issue page for more information.Public Charge Featured Issue Page
Discuss this global pandemic with your fellow members. What are you seeing at your local USCIS office, what visa offices are closed, how is your office handling, and more.Join Discussion
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.