AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 22020256 | Dated May 12, 2022
On February 3, 2022, Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-GA), introduced the Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2022 (H.R. 6577). AILA welcomed the introduction of the bill. Unlike other courts, our nation’s immigration courts are controlled by the Department of Justice — the very same law-enforcement agency that is charged with prosecuting criminal immigration cases in federal courts. This vital piece of legislation would create an immigration court system under Article I of the Constitution, reforming our immigration courts into an independent system that can ensure fair and efficient outcomes.
On May 11, 2022, the House Judiciary Committee marked up the Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2022 (H.R. 6577) and passed it out of committee by a vote of 24-12. AILA submitted a statement for the markup, which was originally scheduled for April 6, 2022 but was delayed. Help us push for immigration court reform by using our Advocacy Action Center today to urge Congress to enact the Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2022 (H.R. 6577)!
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 22020256.
Join AILA in urging your member of Congress to cosponsor legislation to create an independent, Article I immigration court system to ensure that everyone has a fair day in court.Make Your Voice Heard
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.