AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.
View AllThe AILA Career Center offers more than access to the best possible industry candidates.
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 21041931 | Dated June 2, 2021
The U.S. immigration court system suffers from profound structural problems that have severely eroded its capacity to deliver just decisions in a timely manner, as well as public confidence in its outcomes. The root cause of this dysfunction is a conflict of interest built into the system itself: the immigration courts are overseen by the Attorney General (AG), who also supervises the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers who prosecute immigration cases in federal courts. In other words, the chief prosecutor is also the chief judge.
For years we have seen the detrimental effects of a politicized immigration court system. Administrations have repeatedly made policy decisions not because they’re efficient or legally sound, but because they’re politically expedient. This flawed system enabled the Trump administration to transform the immigration courts into an enforcement agency rather than a fair and neutral arbiter, turning immigration judges into “prosecutors in ... judge’s robe[s].” The administration pressured judges to render decisions at a break-neck pace at the cost of accuracy, while stripping them of their ability to control their dockets. EOIR policies—including hiring practices, docket interference, and attempts to terminate the immigration judges’ union—politicized the immigration courts more than ever before.
America needs a just and efficient immigration judicial system not just to ensure due process, but also to ensure the success of the enforcement system and the legal immigration system. It is imperative to make immediate reforms to guarantee judicial independence, fairness, and consistency in decision-making. And ultimately, to operate in a balanced and fair manner, Congress should pass legislation creating an Article I immigration court system that is independent from DOJ.
It is imperative that the Biden administration makes immediate reforms to ensure a functioning court system and due process in the wake of political manipulations by the Trump Administration. See below for resources on why we need the courts to be rehabilitated, what needs to be done, progress that’s been made, and how you can help.
AILA believes America needs an independent, Article I immigration court that will administer our nation’s immigration laws free from political manipulation. See below for resources the urgent need Article I court reform.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 21041931.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.

