AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 21041931 | Dated January 19, 2022
The U.S. immigration court system suffers from profound structural problems that have severely eroded its capacity to deliver just decisions in a timely manner, as well as public confidence in its outcomes. The Trump administration used these foundational flaws to manipulate the courts to their breaking points – pressuring judges to render decisions at a break-neck pace at the cost of accuracy, eliminating docketing tools, growing the backlog, and restricting access to relief. It is imperative that Congress pass legislation that creates an independent Article I immigration court system.
AILA submitted a statement for the record, entitled “Why America Needs an Independent Immigration Court System,” for the January 20, 2022, House Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship’s hearing “For the Rule of Law, An Independent Immigration Court.”
See below for resources on why the courts need to be rehabilitated, progress that's been made, and how you can help.
Ultimately, to operate in a balanced and fair manner, Congress must pass legislation creating an Article I immigration court system. Agency policy alone cannot outweigh the conflict of interest built into the system: the immigration courts are overseen by the Attorney General (AG), who also supervises the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers who prosecute immigration cases in federal courts. In other words, the chief prosecutor is also the chief judge.
For years we have seen the detrimental effects of a politicized immigration court system. Administrations have repeatedly made policy decisions not because they’re efficient or legally sound, but because they’re politically expedient. This flawed system is what enabled the Trump administration to transform the immigration courts into an enforcement agency rather than a fair and neutral arbiter, turning immigration judges into “prosecutors in ... judge’s robe[s].”
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 21041931.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.