AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 13062166 | Dated June 21, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, June 21, 2013
WASHINGTON, DC -The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) today acknowledged the tremendous step forward in the Senate on the part of negotiators who arrived at a difficult political compromise on immigration reform. However, some of the details of that compromise can potentially damage, rather than improve, the immigration system.
The amendment would add more than 40 billion dollars in new border security spending, including a near-doubling of border security agents, new drones, hundreds of miles of fencing, and have a tremendous impact on the quality of life for our fellow citizens in the border cities. But a startling and little-publicized requirement of the amendment would be that all "mandatory enforcement expenditures under the Act" would be funded not by appropriated funds but by additional fees charged to those petitioning through the regular, legal immigration process. Depending upon what would be considered "mandatory" and "enforcement" expenditures, the result could be an increase in filing fees in the thousands of dollars per petition, putting the legal immigration system out of financial reach for families and for small businesses seeking to hire needed foreign-born talent.
"AILA is concerned that the amended bill includes wasteful and needless spending on border security and enforcement. Frankly, I've been fascinated by the number of legislators concerned about spending overall who are now in favor of throwing billions of new dollars at the border, despite not knowing if the increased funding will really solve anything. " said Laura Lichter, AILA President.
She continued, "Let's be realistic. This border "surge" that the amendment's coauthor Senator Corker himself called 'almost overkill' isn't intended to protect against attacks, but is instead going to be spent making our country into 'Fortress America.' I recognize that these changes may be politically expedient, but needed votes shouldn't come at the cost of putting legal immigration out of the financial reach of families and small business. You can't fix a broken system by making it off limits to the very people who are supposed to use it," Ms. Lichter concluded.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 13062166.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.