AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 16070705 | Dated July 7, 2016
Washington, DC – The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and the American Immigration Council (the Council) commented on the decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming that the nearly 20-year-old Flores Settlement Agreement governs the custody and release of all immigrant children, and that the Obama Administration’s family detention practices violate that agreement.
The decision came after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appealed last summer’s ruling by District Court Judge Dolly Gee finding DHS in violation of the agreement. DHS had argued that the settlement did not apply to children apprehended with their mothers, and that the continued detention of children who arrived with their mothers was therefore permissible. However, the appellate court held that the Flores settlement does in fact govern the treatment of both unaccompanied and accompanied children, and that neither the family detention centers nor Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s published standards governing such detention centers comply with the settlement. The appellate court further affirmed that the district court was right to deny DHS’s request to amend the settlement agreement in order to permit family detention to continue. While the court disagreed with the district court’s finding that the settlement’s terms address the release of mothers, its decision does nothing to preclude the release of mothers with their children.
AILA President William A. Stock noted, “This ruling offers the federal government another chance to do the right thing and end family detention. The Obama Administration chose to ramp up the detention of mothers and children fleeing violence, against both legal precedent and our nation’s principles. And now it can finally choose to end it. There are many tools at the administration’s disposal to process families in ways that comply with due process, rejecting fast-track removal procedures like expedited removal and relying instead upon the strength of our court system, and using proven alternatives to detention in the few cases where there are demonstrated flight risks.”
Melissa Crow, Legal Director of the American Immigration Council, said, “The Obama Administration controls the next move. A decision by DHS to respond to this decision by separating children from their mothers would be an affront to our country’s values. Many of the mothers currently in family detention are already panicking about this prospect. Nothing in the court’s decision requires this perverse and inhumane outcome. The administration has everything it needs to protect these asylum seeking-families. President Obama’s legacy on immigration depends on it.”
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 16070705.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.