AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.
Get InvolvedThe brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.
Order NowLearn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.
Register NowAILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 15051462 | Dated May 14, 2015
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, May 14, 2015
CONTACTS: | |
---|---|
George Tzamaras 202-507-7649 gtzamaras@aila.org |
Belle Woods 202-507-7675 bwoods@aila.org |
WASHINGTON, DC - Leslie A. Holman, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), responded to the announcement of plans by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for "enhanced oversight for family residential centers" with the following statement:
"After months of detailing the many failures of the family detention apparatus by AILA and other stakeholders, after months of ICE ignoring those failures and neglecting to act, the announcement is, at its core, almost meaningless. Yes, better oversight of operations and greater access for desperately needed pro bono legal services are long overdue. However, the rest of this announcement is lipstick on a pig.
"ICE announced that now they will work with stakeholders 'to listen and discuss their concerns regarding family residential centers.' Are you kidding me? The concerns have been expressed exhaustively. Are they saying that now they are going to finally listen? If so, why did they issue this 'more of the same' release?
"Mothers trying to find refuge from violence for their children should never have been detained in the first place. Yet they are treated as though they are threats to public safety or national security. One example is Melida and her four-year-old daughter Estrella, locked up for nine months and counting; Estrella's health has deteriorated under the stress of detention and she has lost weight and is chronically ill. They have had the review process that this announcement says will be extended to others. The result? They remain in indefinite detention. And they are not alone in this. How can anyone take seriously the announced review process when it already has proven worthless?
"Will an agency that has fought for detention without bond for victims of domestic abuse be able to 'ensure the designated bond amount continues to be appropriate'? That implies that they were appropriate in the first place, yet when finally forced by a court to issue bonds, ICE has issued them in amounts that are so unattainable as to be equivalent to no bond. It has only been through lengthy immigration court processes that bonds have been brought within reason.
"This new announcement does almost nothing to address the fundamental issue that there is no humane way to detain families. Instead of five new action items, the Administration should turn instead to smart solutions and end family detention once and for all. No innocent child and courageous mother should waste away in a jail."
###
The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.
Read about the key aspects of the new plans and the difference between what ICE says and what AILA knows from our ongoing efforts to end family detention.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 15051462.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.