AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 19020735 | Dated July 10, 2019 | File Size: 281 KDownload the Document
On 7/10/19, the House of Representatives passed the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019 (H.R. 1044) by a vote of 365 to 65.
On 7/10/19, the House is expected to vote on H.R. 1044.
On 7/5/19, H.R. 1044 was added to the Consensus Calendar in the House.
On 6/18/19, Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA-19), chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship, filed a motion to place H.R. 1044 on the Consensus Calendar in the House.
On 2/7/19, Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Ken Buck (R-CO), and 112 bipartisan members introduced the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019 (H.R. 1044), which would among other things eliminate the per-country numerical limitation for employment-based immigrants, and increase the per-country numerical limitation for family-sponsored immigrants from 7 percent to 15 percent.
This is the House companion bill to S. 386: Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 19020735.Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.