AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 15012643 | Dated January 26, 2015 | File Size: 349 KDownload the Document
On 1/16/15, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee Mike McCaul introduced H.R. 399, the “Secure Our Borders First Act.” This bill is significantly different from the bill Chairman McCaul introduced last year, which focused on defining appropriate metrics and developing border security strategies. It garnered bipartisan support and passed out of his Committee unanimously (see AILA’s summary of H.R. 1417, Border Security Results Act of 2013). H.R. 399, by contrast, significantly increases spending on the border by defining sector-by-sector minimum technology and fencing requirements and includes an impossible-to-attain “operational control” goal of preventing 100 percent of unlawful entries and contraband. The bill further prevents political appointees within DHS from reviewing data and evaluating metrics and imposes penalties (including no bonus pay or salary increases) on those appointees if DHS cannot achieve the bill’s requirements. The bill does not include any measures to permit border community participation in planning and does not address CBP accountability.
For more information, visit: http://homeland.house.gov/secure-our-borders#Bill
On January 26, 2015, the Congressional Budget Office released it cost estimate for H.R. 399.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 15012643.Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.