AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 18082236 | Dated August 23, 2018
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 23, 2018
WASHINGTON, DC - Government officials used coercive tactics against parents who were separated from their children, according to a complaint filed with Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) by the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and the American Immigration Council (Council) as part of the Immigration Justice Campaign. The complaint points to numerous examples, including that of Mrs. D.P., who was separated from her 9-year-old daughter for 47 days as a result of Attorney General Jeff Sessions' "zero-tolerance" border policy. While separated, she was given a telephonic credible fear interview; for those in expedited removal proceedings, this is the first step in their pursuit of asylum in the United States, in which an asylum officer determines if one has "credible fear of persecution."
During the call, Mrs. D.P. cried hysterically and requested the whereabouts of her daughter repeatedly, unaware that the asylum officer on the phone knew nothing about her daughter and was solely asking about her asylum case. Mrs. D.P. was then told to "watch the news" to learn where her daughter was. After receiving a negative decision from the Asylum Office, government officials asked her to sign her deportation papers. When she refused, she was subject to multiple instances of physical and verbal intimidation.
The complaint includes case examples and original testimony from separated parents that document a pervasive, and illegal, practice by DHS officials of coercing mothers and fathers into signing documents they may not have understood, ostensibly waiving their legal rights, including their right to be reunified with their children. These tactics, according to AILA and the Council, impeded these parents' ability to meaningfully participate in the asylum process. Dozens of separated parents, most of whom signed paperwork they did not understand, remain detained and separated from their children.
According to Katie Shepherd, National Advocacy Counsel with the Immigration Justice Campaign, "The practice of family separation is reprehensible, but this complaint shows the depth and breadth of this unjust policy. Parents, under implicit and explicit duress and coercion, were unknowingly relinquishing their rights to a fair day in court. These parents are desperate to save their children. The government took full advantage with actions that are not only morally inexcusable, but also unconstitutional. We urge the government's oversight agencies to investigate DHS's use of coercive tactics against parents and ensure that all parents and children subjected to this coercion be immediately reunified."
The American Immigration Council is a powerful voice in promoting laws, policies, and attitudes that honor America's proud history as a nation of immigrants. Through research and policy analysis, litigation and international exchange, the Council seeks to shape a twenty-first century vision of the American immigrant experience. Follow the latest Council news and information on ImmigrationImpact.com and Twitter @immcouncil.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 18082236.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.