AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.
View AllThe AILA Career Center offers more than access to the best possible industry candidates.
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 18011732 | Dated January 10, 2018 | File Size: 808 K
Download the DocumentOn 6/21/18, the vote on H.R. 4760 failed: 193-231. No Democrats voted for the bill. Forty-one Republicans voted against the bill. AILA recommended that representatives vote “no” on H.R. 4760 because it holds Dreamers hostage in return for provisions that would upend our immigration system and betray our values.
On 6/12/18, Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) announced that the House of Representatives will hold votes on two immigration bills: H.R. 4760 and H.R. 6136.
On 1/10/18, Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) introduced the Securing America’s Future Act of 2018, which among other things, would eliminate the Diversity Visa Program and family-based immigration for certain relatives, and provide DACA recipients a three-year renewable legal status.
AILA released a policy brief highlighting a few of the "Securing America's Future Act of 2018" (H.R. 4760) most egregious provisions, including slashes to legal immigration, harsh enforcement tactics, the criminalization of unlawful presence, and weak protections for a small group of Dreamers.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 18011732.
Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.

