AILA Doc. No. 11111035 | Dated November 8, 2011 | File Size: 662 KDownload the Document
AILA amicus brief arguing that the CA5 exhaustion rule is based on a questionable interpretation of INA §242(d) and suggesting rehearing en banc to address the circuit split and clarify that there are no bars to judicial review in cases involving unforeseeable errors of law.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 11111035.Open the Document