AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments one year after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 22071302 | Dated August 11, 2022
The interim final rule (IFR) “Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers” went into effect on May 31, 2022, changing the way DHS processes asylum cases for individuals in expedited removal. The IFR creates a significantly condensed processing time and shifts some of the processing that used to happen at the southern border to interior cities. Immigration attorneys around the country are needed to help asylum seekers navigate this new process.
Under the IFR, asylum seekers who pass a credible fear interview will have their interview count as an asylum application before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and have an “Asylum Merits Interview” (AMI) scheduled within 21 to 45 days. The asylum officer will be based out of one of the six cities currently designated by USCIS (Boston, Miami, New York, Newark, San Francisco, or Los Angeles), not at the border. If asylum is denied, then the person will be referred to an immigration court in the same city, and the immigration court is expected to resolve the case within two to four months.
Currently, at this stage of the rollout, the IFR is limited to individuals who:
This page provides background materials, resources, and ways to sign up to be referred a client going through this process by a nonprofit on the southern border.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 22071302.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.