A joint initiative between the American Immigration Council and AILA seeks to change the playing field for immigrants facing deportation.
AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.Get Involved
The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
Learn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.Register Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20012705 | Dated January 27, 2020
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 27, 2020
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) expressed disappointment and concern at the 5-4 Supreme Court decision to stay the current nationwide injunction of the “public charge” rule. The administration can now, temporarily at least, implement the Public Charge Final Rule while the underlying litigation continues.
AILA Director of Federal Litigation Jesse Bless stated, “As soon as the rule is implemented, AILA expects a rapid and glaring increase in the number of immigrants deemed inadmissible and thus ineligible for various immigration benefits, including applicants for lawful permanent residence (known as ‘green cards’) due to the use of certain government services, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid, which their family members are legally entitled to claim. With limited exceptions, the final rule allows USCIS to deny admission to a foreign national who has received or is likely to receive certain public benefits for more than 12 months within any 36-month period. This policy contravenes Congressional intent and provides the latest attempt to construct an invisible wall blocking the pre-existing rights for legal immigrants. The rule will undoubtedly result in the separation of tens of thousands of families seeking to reunite in the United States.
“The one exception is Illinois, where the litigation, led by Cook County and the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, led to a state-specific injunction. There, the district court enjoined the public charge rule within Illinois and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has so far rejected the government’s requests for a stay of the injunction. Since the administration did not file for a stay of the 7th Circuit’s order with the Supreme Court, the rule is still enjoined in Illinois for now.”
For further information, go to AILA’s Featured Issue page on public charge.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20012705.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.