AILA Files Amicus Brief in CA5 Case Interpreting Exhaustion

AILA amicus brief arguing that the CA5 exhaustion rule is based on a questionable interpretation of INA §242(d) and suggesting rehearing en banc to address the circuit split and clarify that there are no bars to judicial review in cases involving unforeseeable errors of law.

[This functionality does not work on your device. Please use the download button to access the PDF. A separate PDF reading app may be necessary.]

Cite as AILA Doc. No. 11111035.

Open the Document