Get the AC23 better-late-than-never discount. Use code AC23100REG for $100 off the advance member rate. Offer expires on May 30.
Get the AC23 better-late-than-never discount. Use code AC23100REG for $100 off the advance member rate. Offer expires on May 30.
A joint initiative between the American Immigration Council and AILA seeks to change the playing field for immigrants facing deportation.
AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.
Get Involved
The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.
Order Now
Learn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.
Register Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 21050633 | Dated April 9, 2021 | File Size: 837 K
Download the DocumentAILA submitted an amicus brief in the first circuit arguing that the court should adopt a “logical connection” test as the proper analysis for materiality of evidence of changed country conditions in the context of a motion to reopen. The brief also discusses the proper understanding of the prima facie eligibility requirement and the importance of not conflating it with the materiality requirement. (V-C- v. Garland, April 9, 2021)
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 21050633.
Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.
