AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20101906 | Dated February 19, 2021
Individual and organizational plaintiffs, represented by AILA and members of AILA's Board of Governors, filed an amended complaint to stop the DOL final rule changing the prevailing wage rates. Follow this page for information on Purdue, et al., v. Scalia, et al. litigation.
An amended complaint was filed to hold DOL’s “final rule unlawful and prevent the Defendants from implementing the new calculations for wage levels or otherwise implementing the final rule.” The complaint states, “The litigation and this Court’s resulting partial summary order granted against the Interim Final Rule (“IFR”) did not prevent the previous administration’s midnight haste to convert the IFR to a Final Rule. Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States, 86 Fed. Reg. 3608-01 (Jan. 14. 2021) (“final rule” or “rule”). While modified, Defendants re-imposed similarly drastic unlawful increases in prevailing wage levels that this Court and two other separate district courts previously set aside. The final rule, which is set to take effect May 14, 2021, suffers from the same substantive defects and new procedural defects as the previously vacated IFR. The substantive changes continue to be based on faulty, undocumented, and irrational economic assumptions that ignore the thousands of comments to the IFR, misapprehend the data behind its calculations, and do not account for the harms to plaintiffs. Neither iteration of the rules contains a reasoned explanation for instituting such an arbitrary change and both rules were promulgated in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s (“APA”) notice-and-comment requirements.”
A federal judge granted summary judgment against DOL’s interim final rule that changed the prevailing wage rates. The judge ordered DOL to reissue prevailing wage determinations that were issued under the rule. (Purdue University, et al., v. Scalia, et al., 12/14/20)
For more information, read AILA’s Press Release: Big Win on Pro Bono Suit Challenging Department of Labor’s Midnight Rule Changing Prevailing Wage Determinations
Seventeen individual and organizational plaintiffs, represented by AILA and members of AILA's Board of Governors, filed a complaint seeking an injunction to stop the DOL interim final rule changing the prevailing wage rates issued on 10/8/20. (Purdue, et al., v. Scalia, et al., 10/19/20)
On October 23, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction requesting that:
“Based on the foregoing, the Court should enter a preliminarily injunction enjoining Defendants and the Department of Labor from implementing, applying, or enforcing the Interim Final Rule, 85 Fed. Reg. 63872, or any of the prevailing wage methodologies or prevailing wage rates under the Interim Final Rule, in its entirety.”
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20101906.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.