A joint initiative between the American Immigration Council and AILA seeks to change the playing field for immigrants facing deportation.
AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.Get Involved
The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
Learn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.Register Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 19100733 | Dated October 7, 2019
WASHINGTON, DC - Today, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) filed suit in United States District Court for the District of Columbia to ensure a workable transition over to new forms as the administration seeks to implement the public charge rule. The case is American Immigration Lawyers Association, et. al. v. Cuccinelli, 1:19-cv-02835. The complaint seeks to immediately enjoin U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) from moving forward with its arbitrary and capricious plan to stop accepting the current versions of Forms I-485, I-129, I-539, I-864, and I-864EZ, if postmarked on or after October 15, 2019, despite having failed to publish necessary revised and new forms.
Marketa Lindt, AILA President noted, "The agency's recent announcement that it would stop accepting forms without any meaningful notice to the affected immigrants, families, businesses and their legal representatives, places unacceptable and unnecessary burdens on our communities and the workforce. The decision to litigate is never undertaken lightly. In this case, the need for a smooth transition and clarifying agency guidance is essential given the enormity of the disruptive impact that this sudden change would have on so many businesses and immigrants. Despite being one week from implementation, USCIS has not even published the new versions of the mandatory forms and the regulation in question provides for no transition or grace period for the use of older forms. Before filing this lawsuit, AILA reached out to multiple federal agencies about providing for a workable transition, to no avail. We recognize that a number of other stakeholders are already litigating on the substance of the public charge rule, and we support those efforts. AILA's lawsuit is focused on the unreasonable refusal by the agency to accept any application that is not submitted on its new forms despite the fact that we are only eight days away from the deadline, and the new forms have not even been published."
Jesse Bless, Director of Federal Litigation at AILA added, "Petitions and applications can take weeks or months to assemble and submit properly. Having these major changes in policy set to begin in eight days with no new forms to be seen, and the government insisting that no old forms will be accepted as of that date, would be laughable if we weren't talking about incredibly important changes in peoples' lives and livelihoods. In years past, when a change was made, a grace or transition period was set if new forms weren't yet available. AILA has brought this lawsuit with Parrilli Renison, LLC, a highly regarded immigration law firm suffering from the arbitrary decision of USCIS. Although we attempted to resolve this injustice without litigation, USCIS failed to consider our reasonable demands for an adequate, 60-day grace period. AILA remains committed to serving its members in every possible way, including litigation, where appropriate and necessary. Such is the case here."
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 19100733.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.