AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 19012842 | Dated January 28, 2019
WASHINGTON, DC - Late last week, the Trump administration announced that it would begin to roll-out its "Remain in Mexico" plan. Details were sparse until today, when U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a policy memorandum revealing portions of the plan, which the administration has now dubbed the "Migrant Protection Protocols" (MPP). The MPP alters screening procedures at ports of entry for Central American asylum applicants by having USCIS officers conduct an "assessment" that determines whether applicants can pursue their claims from within the United States or whether they will be forced to do so from Mexico. Notwithstanding the fact that the assessment involves complex questions regarding persecution and torture on legally protected grounds, access to counsel during screening is prohibited.
American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) Executive Director Benjamin Johnson responded, "This USCIS assessment process, which is functionally similar to asylum screening, will consist of a lightning quick judgment that will be over before a person newly arriving at the border even understands what asylum is. By blocking access to counsel, USCIS will prevent many families and individuals with legitimate claims for asylum from having a fair shot at protection by curtailing their rights and forcing them to pursue their claims from outside the U.S. where access to legal advice and resources is sparse. Following the implementation of the travel ban and the ensuing chaos at U.S. airports, AILA called on the administration to amend its regulations to allow legal representation during primary and secondary inspection at ports of entry. With the implementation of this new screening process, access to counsel at ports of entry has become even more critical. AILA will continue to fight for the due process rights of asylum seekers."
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 19012842.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.