A joint initiative between the American Immigration Council and AILA seeks to change the playing field for immigrants facing deportation.
AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.Get Involved
The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
Learn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.Register Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 21051736 | Dated May 17, 2021
Belle Woods, AILA, 202-507-7675, firstname.lastname@example.org
George Tzamaras, AILA, 202-507-7649, email@example.com
Jalisa McGaha, Siskind Susser PC, 901-682-6455, firstname.lastname@example.org
WASHINGTON D.C. –– Today, five nonprofit organizations and businesses, represented by the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), Jeff Joseph of Joseph and Hall PC, Charles Kuck of Kuck Baxter Immigration LLC, and Greg Siskind of Siskind Susser PC, sued to enjoin the final rule published January 8, 2021 entitled Modification of Registration Requirement for Petitioners Seeking To File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions, which is also known as the H-1B lottery rule.
Jesse Bless, AILA’s Director of Federal Litigation stated, "This rule has been unlawful since its inception under the Trump administration and promulgation under former DHS official Chad Wolf. District courts have repeatedly and unanimously ruled that Mr. Wolf lacked the authority to change immigration policy. Even if Mr. Wolf could have promulgated the H-1B rule, it’s substantively unlawful because it directly contravenes U.S. immigration law. Choosing highly-skilled workers solely on the basis of wages arbitrarily aligns a worker’s pay with value, something wrong and unAmerican."
Jeff Joseph, Senior Partner of Joseph and Hall, PC, stated, "Dealing with the Department of Labor often feels like The Hunger Games. Everyone is required to play the game, but no one knows the rules and the rules are constantly changing. This is not a game and under this misguided rule, the odds are definitely in favor of the largest and wealthiest of businesses. Smaller and rural businesses are left out of the lottery for reasons that are arbitrary, illegal and not rationally related to the economy."
Charles Kuck, managing partner of Kuck Baxter Immigration LLC said, "A 'lottery' that is more of an auction for skilled work visas is both illegal under federal law and unjust by any standard, as it places individuals who live in more expensive locales against those equally necessary and skilled workers who live in rural and less expensive areas. Equitable distribution of H-1B visas is necessary to maintain our country’s global competitiveness."
Greg Siskind, founding partner of Siskind Susser PC noted, "The H-1B statute was intended to make sure that US workers are not being underpaid, not to create a system where nonprofit organizations are never able to recruit vital talent because they can’t compete with the for-profit sector, nor was it intended to kneecap universities and hospitals by making it extremely difficult for graduating students and medical residents to qualify for H-1B visas. This rule may have sounded good to the people who came up with the idea, but it will cause disastrous collateral damage."
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 21051736.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.