AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief on Asylum Credibility Determinations

AILA and partners submitted an amicus brief in Rosen v. Dai and Rosen v. Alcaraz-Enriquez in the Supreme Court arguing that federal appellate courts have a statutory mandate under the REAL ID Act to treat the testimony of asylum seekers as credible where neither an IJ nor the BIA has made an explicit adverse credibility determination.

Related Resources

• CA9 Finds Requirement to Accept Asylum Petitioner’s Testimony as True Where IJ and BIA Did Not Make Adverse Credibility Determination (Dai v. Sessions, 3/8/18)
• CA9 Declines to Rehear Dai v. Sessions En Banc (Dai v. Barr, 10/22/19)
• Barr v. Alcaraz-Enriquez (3/9/18)