A joint initiative between the American Immigration Council and AILA seeks to change the playing field for immigrants facing deportation.
AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.Get Involved
The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
Learn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.Register Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 19100200 | Dated October 2, 2019 | File Size: 350 KDownload the Document
USCIS issued a document making corrections to the language of the final rule on inadmissibility on public charge grounds issued at 84 FR 41292 on 8/14/19, including a correction to language related to the exclusion of public benefits receipt from consideration for spouses and children of individuals serving in the U.S. Armed Forces. The provisions in this correcting document are effective as if they had been included in the original final rule document. (84 FR 52357, 10/2/19)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 103, 212, 213, 214, 245 and 248
[CIS No. 2637–19; DHS Docket No. USCIS–2010–0012]
Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds; Correction
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 19100200.Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.