AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20080301 | Dated October 16, 2020
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied without prejudice the plaintiffs’ emergency motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the defendants from compelling in-person appearances at the Newark Immigration Court and to require the Newark Immigration Court to provide attorneys with the option to appear remotely by video conference due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In an accompanying order, U.S. District Judge John Vazquez also denied the defendants’ request to dismiss the case as moot. The court found that because the Newark Immigration Court had voluntarily implemented a remote videoconferencing option, the plaintiffs had failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for their Administrative Procedure Act (APA) claim or their Fifth Amendment state-created danger claim, and could not establish imminent irreparable harm for either claim. The court noted that if, in the plaintiffs’ view, circumstances arise that necessitate relief, the plaintiffs will be free to seek whatever relief they deem to be appropriate at the time. (AILA New Jersey Chapter v. EOIR, 10/16/20)
Plaintiffs oppose the government’s request in its September 30, 2020 letter that asked the court to dismiss this matter as moot because it had started conducting remote video hearings at the Newark Immigration Court through the Cisco WebEx platform. Plaintiff’s outline concerns about EOIR’s inconsistent rollout of new video hearings. Plaintiffs explain that “EOIR’s failure to establish comprehensive rules, policies, and procedures governing WebEx hearings has had practical consequences, as the rollout of videoconferencing software has been accompanied by inconsistent practices and ineffective, unsafe hearings.”
Attorneys for the defendants sent a letter to the court reporting that EOIR has implemented a new video conferencing option, specifically Cisco WebEx, at the Newark Immigration Court, which allows hearing participants to connect remotely to individual merits hearings without having to appear in person at the immigration court. The defendants also asked the court to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint as moot.
Defendants requested on consent, and the Court granted on September 21, 2020, an extension to submit responsive information to the Court’s Order until October 2, 2020. As part of the basis for Defendants’ extension request, Defendants noted that EOIR was exploring the potential implementation of a remote video conferencing option at the Newark Immigration Court, distinct from the video teleconferencing (VTC) platform that EOIR has employed at the Newark Immigration Court for many years.
The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding a new plaintiff attorney in the case. (AILA New Jersey Chapter v. EOIR, 9/15/20)
On September 3, 2020, U.S. District Judge John Michael Vasquez heard oral arguments on the AILA New Jersey Chapter’s request for a Preliminary Injunction. (AILA New Jersey Chapter v. EOIR, 8/7/20).
Law360: NJ Immigration Attys Can't Stop In-Person Hearings for Now – September 3, 2020
AILA’s New Jersey Chapter filed its reply in further support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Oral argument is scheduled for September 3, 2020, at 2:00 pm (ET).
EOIR opposed the AILA New Jersey Chapter’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. AILA New Jersey Chapter’s reply is due on September 1, 2020. Oral argument is scheduled for September 3, 2020, at 2:00 pm (ET).
Law360: DOJ Slams Call to Halt NJ In-Person Immigration Hearings – August 27, 2020
The AILA New Jersey Chapter filed a motion for preliminary injunction, as well as a brief in support of the motion, requesting the court to issue a Preliminary Injunction prohibiting EOIR from compelling attorneys to attend in-person proceedings at the Newark Immigration Court.
The AILA New Jersey Chapter filed a complaint in district court seeking to enjoin the Newark Immigration Court from forcing immigration attorneys to appear for in-person proceedings at the Newark, New Jersey immigration court during the COVID-19 pandemic. (AILA New Jersey Chapter v. EOIR, 7/31/20)
The complaint noted that:
“The Newark Immigration Court is no stranger to the devastating effects of COVID-19. The coronavirus spread through the court before it closed in March, and COVID-19 illnesses tragically caused the deaths of both a longtime private immigration attorney and a staffer at the immigration prosecutor’s office, as well as causing the serious illness of both a senior immigration prosecutor and a court translator.”
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20080301.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.