- About
The Immigration Justice Campaign
A joint initiative between the American Immigration Council and AILA seeks to change the playing field for immigrants facing deportation.
- Membership
Eligible to Join AILA?
Apply Today - Advocacy
and MediaTake Action Now
AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.
Get Involved - eLearning and
Conferences - Publications
And VideosHot Off the Press
Order Your Copy Today!The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.
Order Now- Law
Practice
Learn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.
Register Now- InfoNet
Research LibraryAILALink
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
- Recent
PostingsAILA Policy Brief: Imposing Numeric Quotas on Judges Threatens the Independence and Integrity of Courts
AILA Doc. No. 17101234 | Dated October 12, 2017 | File Size: 731 K
Download the DocumentOn Tuesday, October 19, 2021, Chief Immigration Judge Tracy Short sent the following message to all immigration judges, ending numerical quotas:
From Judge Short:
Judges,
Good afternoon. Effective immediately, the performance metrics instituted in 2018 for individual immigration judges are hereby suspended. The Office of the Director and the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge are conducting a comprehensive review of the immigration judge performance work plan and performance measures. The Agency is in the process of developing new performance measures, drawing from past successful measures and appropriate input, that will accurately reflect the workload of an immigration judge. These new performance measures will focus on balance and equity for the various types of docket assignments, and we look forward to sharing them with you shortly.
Thank you for your dedicated service and commitment to EOIR’s critical mission.
Tracy Short
Chief Immigration Judge
On October 12, 2017, the Washington Post reported that the DOJ plans to impose numeric quotas on immigration judges as part of their performance evaluations. The judges' union and DOJ are still in negotiations; however, the judges are speaking out.
- Listen to NPR interview: Immigration Judges Warn Against Trump Administration Benchmarks (10/16/17)
AILA strongly opposes this proposal and issued a policy brief on DOJ's plans and why this unprecedented effort to compel judges to complete cases under stricter deadlines threatens the integrity of the immigration court system, the independence of the judicial branch, and the due process rights of AILA members' clients.
For additional information, see the following resources:
- AILA Press Release: Trump Administration Erodes Integrity and Fairness in Immigration Courts (10/12/17)
- NAIJ Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee Oversight Hearing on DOJ (10/17/2017)
- NAIJ States that Performance Quotas on Immigration Judges are a Threat to Due Process (10/1/2017)
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 17101234.
Open the DocumentRelated Resources
- Biden Administration Rightly Removes Artificial Quotas for Immigration Judges (10/21/21)
- AILA: Trump Administration Erodes Integrity and Fairness in Immigration Courts (10/12/17)
- Washington Post: Immigration judges say proposed quotas from Justice Dept. threaten independence (10/12/17)
- AILA Resolution on Immigration Court Reform and Funding (9/16/17)
- Law
Navigate AILA.org
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.