The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20042500 | Dated April 29, 2020 | File Size: 822 KDownload the Document
On April 25, 2020, AILA, the Justice Action Center, the Innovation Law Lab, and the Latino Network, requested a temporary restraining (TRO) order to halt implementation of the April 22, 2020, Presidential Proclamation. The restraining order would protect certain underage visa applicants.
On April 29, 2020, District Court Judge Michael H. Simon issued an order denying the TRO motion seeking to protect F2A age-out class members subject to the April 2020 Presidential Proclamation. The Judge’s decision rests on the motion’s form, not its substance. Specifically, the judge states that “Plaintiffs’ All Writs Act challenge to the April 22nd Proclamation should be brought as a separate challenge specific to that proclamation, seeking a preliminary injunction or TRO under Rule 65, if appropriate.”
The decision notes, “The Court recognizes the potential seriousness of the repercussions of a preference category F2A child being automatically converted to a preference category F2B upon his or her turning 21, as calculated under the CSPA. Based on the information provided by Plaintiffs, there are sufficiently available visas in category F2A, but, depending on the country of origin, immigrant visa applicant wait times can be more than 65 years for applicants in category F2B. “In the end, [however], we are a nation of laws, and if we are to continue to be so, the pre-existing and well-established federal law governing injunctions . . . must be applied to [this] case.” Schiavo, 403 F.3d at 1229 (denying an All Writs Act injunction). If visa limits or wait times for preference category F2B are unreasonably constricted, that is a matter for Congress to fix, not the courts.”
This order does not change the injunction issued against the Healthcare Insurance Proclamation.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20042500.Open the Document
AILA's Benefits Litigation Committee collaborates with attorneys from partner organizations to identify and challenge policy positions used to support the denial of immigration benefits and creates resources for AILA members to build AILA's litigation capacity.BUILD YOUR Litigation Skills
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.