AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments one year after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20030932 | Dated March 6, 2020 | File Size: 369 KDownload the Document
DOL notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) establishing a system of discretionary secretarial review of BALCA cases and making changes to DOL regulations governing the timing and finality of decisions of BALCA and the Administrative Review Board. Comments are due 4/6/20. The NPRM is a companion to the direct final rule published at 85 FR 13024 with identical changes to the regulatory text. If DOL receives significant adverse comments in response to the direct final rule, this NPRM will provide the procedural framework to finalize the rule. (85 FR 13086, 3/6/20)
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
20 CFR Parts 641, 655, 656, 658, 667, 683, and 702
Office of the Secretary of Labor
29 CFR Parts 2, 7, 8, 10, 13, 18, 24, 29, 38, and 96
Office of Labor-Management Standards
29 CFR Parts 417 and 471
Wage and Hour Division
29 CFR Parts 501 and 580
Occupational Health and Safety Administration
29 CFR Parts 1978 Through 1988
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
41 CFR Parts 50–203 and 60–30
Discretionary Review by the Secretary
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOL.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20030932.Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.