AILA’s Advocacy Action Center allows you to advocate for legislative and policy reforms consistent with AILA’s principles and priorities.
Get InvolvedThe brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.
Order NowLearn how to tackle challenges like finding and retaining affordable staff, working better in a hybrid or remote environment, when and how to raise fees, and much more.
Register NowAILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 23032401 | Dated March 28, 2023 | File Size: 287 K
Download the DocumentFinal rule to extend the application of the 2002 Safe Third Country Agreement between the U.S. and Canada to individuals who cross between official POEs, pursuant to the Additional Protocol of 2022 negotiated by the U.S. and Canada. The final rule is effective at 12:01 am on 3/25/23. (88 FR 18227, 3/28/23)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 208
[CIS No. 2720–22; DHS Docket No. USCIS– 2023–0003]
RIN 1615–AC84
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for Immigration Review
8 CFR Parts 1003 and 1240
[EOIR No. 23–0010; AG Order No. 5632– 2023]
RIN 1125–AB29
Implementation of the 2022 Additional Protocol to the 2002 U.S.-Canada Agreement for Cooperation in the Examination of Refugee Status Claims From Nationals of Third Countries
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security; Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 23032401.
Open the DocumentAmerican Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.