Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
Affirmative Asylum Scheduling Bulletin (3/11/16)
USCIS’s Affirmative Asylum Scheduling Bulletin as of 3/11/16. This Bulletin explains how the Asylum Division has prioritized the adjudication of affirmative applications for asylum.
USCIS Provides Guidance on Processing Affirmative Applications (Form I-589) Filed by Applicants in Expedited Removal and Processing Credible Fear Case
USCIS released a memorandum with procedures for processing affirmative asylum applications (Form I-589) filed by individuals in expedited removal and for processing credible fear cases for individuals who are in expedited removal and who are not in immigration detention (non-detained).
BIA Reverses Finding That DHS Rebutted Respondent’s Presumption of a Well-Founded Fear
Unpublished BIA decision reversed the IJ’s finding that a fundamental change in circumstances had occurred in Togo such that would rebut the presumed well-founded fear of persecution of an asylum applicant who had suffered past persecution. Courtesy of Charles Ellison.
USCIS Alert: TSC Now Processing Certain Form I-765 Cases
USCIS recently began transferring Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, filed by an asylum applicant with a pending asylum application filed on or after January 4, 1995, from the Vermont Service Center (VSC) to the Texas Service Center (TSC) to balance workloads.
#0087
The Artesia Family Residential Center was thrown together in late June 2014 in the dark of night and in the middle of the New Mexico desert. Before the pro bono attorneys knew who or what was there, the first plane had already flown South, returning refugees who were streamlined through a farce of a
DOJ OIL March/April 2016 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for March/April 2016, with articles on Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch and Gonzalez v. Attorney General, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for March/April 2016.
CRS Report: Federal Court Declines to Bar the Resettlement of Syrian Refugees in Texas
A CRS Legal Sidebar report discusses a 2/8/16 decision in which a federal district court denied Texas’s request that the federal government and a private refugee relief organization be temporarily barred from resettling Syrian refugees within the state.
Benefits of Volunteering Go Beyond the Client
I spend most of my days steeped in PERM filings, H-1Bs and other thorny employment-based conundrums. I don't speak Spanish. The number of asylum cases I have handled can be counted on one hand. I have rarely represented clients in Immigration Court. And yet, last year, I offered to help the CARA Fam
Immigrant Rights Organizations Argue Against Government’s Inhumane Family Detention Policies
The four CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project partners joined with other immigrant rights organizations in an amicus brief explaining how the government has misinterpreted the Flores settlement and failed to comply with Judge Dolly Gee's August 2015 ruling in the case.
AILA and the NJIC File Amicus Brief with CA11 on Issue Exhaustion
AILA joined the National Immigrant Justice Center (NJIC) in filing an amicus brief with the 11th Circuit in Jeune v. Lynch urging the court to treat issue exhaustion as a claims-processing rule rather than a jurisdictional matter.
CA1 Finds Petitioner's Nine-Day Detention and Beatings Did Not Qualify as Past Persecution
The court held that a single detention, even one accompanied by beatings, does not necessarily rise to the level of past persecution, and upheld BIA's finding that petitioner's treatment by family planning authorities in China did not qualify as past persecution. (Chen v. Lynch, 2/24/16)
CA1 Says Women with Children Whose Husbands Live and Work in the U.S. Is Not a PSG
The court held that the BIA supportably found that petitioner had not presented evidence that her proposed particular social group (PSG)—women with children whose husbands live and work in the U.S.—was socially distinct. (Granada-Rubio v. Lynch, 2/24/16)
CA8 Upholds Withholding of Removal Denial to El Salvadorian Whose Murdered Cousin Belonged to Gang
The court held that none of the proposed family-based social groups in which petitioner claimed membership had the kind of visibility and particularity required to constitute a recognizable social group. (Aguinada-Lopez v. Lynch, 2/23/16)
CA5 Remands for BIA to Determine Whether Asylum Status Is Terminated upon Adjustment to LPR Status
Finding that the BIA did not address relevant subsections of INA §201, DHS regulations, and previous BIA decisions, the court remanded for the BIA to consider in the first instance whether a petitioner's asylum status is terminated upon adjustment to LPR status. (Ali v. Lynch, 2/22/16)
CA4 Says BIA Did Not Err in Following Matter of J-E- to Deny Petitioner's CAT Application
Deferring to the BIA's interpretation of the CAT's intent requirement as articulated in Matter of J-E-, the court found that the BIA did not err in denying petitioner's application for deferral of removal under CAT. (Oxygene v. Lynch, 2/22/16)
CA7 Grants Withholding of Removal to Woman Who Fears FGM in Botswana
The court held that substantial evidence did not support the BIA's conclusion that petitioner likely would not be subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM) if she were removed to Botswana, in light of petitioner's credible testimony that her family practiced FGM. (Musa v. Lynch, 2/19/16)
CA8 Upholds CAT Denial Where Petitioner Failed to Show She Would Likely Be Tortured in Haiti
The court upheld the BIA's denial of the petitioner's application for CAT relief, finding that the BIA did not err in concluding that the petitioner failed to show that she would more likely than not be tortured if removed to Haiti. (Mervil v. Lynch, 2/19/16)
Sign-on Letter to DHS on Enhancing Due Process for Refugees
On 2/18/16, AILA joined immigrants’ rights, civil rights, human rights, faith-based, and legal service providers in urging Department of Homeland Security to enhance due process for Central American refugees and stop the raids.
Understanding the Central American Refugee Crisis: Why They are Fleeing and How U.S. Policies are Failing to Deter Them
A new report from the American Immigration Council explains why the Obama administration’s aggressive deterrence strategy towards potential migrants, including a media campaign launched in Central America, as well as aggressive detention and deportation practices, is not working.
What Asylum Law is About
I'm an asylum lawyer. Every day I fight for victims of persecution and torture from all over the world. I listen to their stories and I give them a voice. Perhaps some of the most compelling and most amazing stories of survival have been those of women - women from the Middle East fleeing the [&#
AILA Welcomes Introduction of Access to Counsel Legislation
AILA welcomed the introduction of the “Fair Day in Court for Kids Act of 2016” AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis noted, “This legislation would go a long way toward ensuring a measure of fairness and due process in the immigration system for the most vulnerable.”
CA2 Says BIA Failed to Provide Sufficient Basis for Rejecting IJ's Findings
The court held that, although BIA recognized its obligation to apply the “clear error” standard of review to IJ’s findings of fact, it erred in its application of that standard and provided an insufficient basis for finding IJ's determinations to be clearly erroneous. (Lin v. Lynch, 2/11/16)
CA5 Reaffirms That "Aliens Whose Removal Orders Are Reinstated" May Not Apply for Asylum
The court denied the petition for rehearing en banc, reaffirming that INA §241(a)(5)'s "plain language, relevant regulations, and analogous case law" compel the conclusion that asylum is not available as relief to individuals found guilty of illegal reentry. (Ramirez-Mejia v. Lynch, 2/11/16)
New Mexico Senators Urge the President to Suspend Removals of Central American Families
On 2/10/16, Senators Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich of New Mexico asked President Obama to suspend immigration removal actions against children and families from Central America.
Handwritten Letter from Thirty Mothers Held at Berks Family Detention Center
Thirty mothers detained with their children at the Berks Family Detention Center wrote a letter to the media pleading for their freedom; the letter is in Spanish, an English translation is available.