The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 22052009 | Dated May 20, 2022
Washington, DC – Allen Orr, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) responded to the decision from U.S. District Judge Summerhays to issue a preliminary injunction against the Biden administration’s lifting of Title 42, a public health law, which had been scheduled to occur on May 23. Mr. Orr’s statement follows:
“We are disappointed but in no way surprised by this decision. The judge had signaled that he believed the unjust use of a public health law as a cruel and anti-immigrant tool to expel vulnerable asylum seekers was okay by him. Thousands upon thousands of migrants have been illegally expelled before being allowed to have a meaningful chance to claim protection under our laws. That injustice will continue because of this meritless decision.
“This just shows again that Congress and all Americans must ensure that the laws are in fact changed so that Title 42 can never be used as a bludgeon against those who need our protection the most. The hypocrisy in being unwilling to wear a mask to protect others during a global pandemic, while demanding a public health law be used to expel asylum seekers, is reprehensible. We deserve better, we demand better, we will overcome this decision and ensure America’s compassion and commitment to fairness and justice prevail.”
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 22052009.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.