Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
Sign-On Letter to EOIR Regarding New York Immigration Courts Lack of Preparation for Coronavirus Outbreak
On 3/12/20, 104 legal service providers representing immigrants wrote a letter to EOIR expressing extreme concern at the lack of guidance or proactive initiatives taken by EOIR to safeguard the health of those interacting with the New York immigration courts in light of the coronavirus outbreak.
AILA Sends Letter to ICE Regarding ICE Facilities and COVID-19
On 3/12/20, AILA sent a letter to ICE requesting that ICE immediately implement procedures for the prevention and management of COVID-19 at all ICE facilities, including all detention centers and ICE locations where individuals must report for ICE supervision.
CRS Releases Legal Sidebar on the First Amendment and “Encouraging” or “Inducing” Unlawful Immigration
CRS released a legal sidebar on U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith in which SCOTUS is considering the constitutionality of a prohibition against encouraging or inducing unlawful immigration. The sidebar provides an overview of the case, issues raised by it, and potential implications for Congress.
Members of Congress Seek Information on DHS’s Plan to Prevent and Respond to COVID-19 in Detention Facilities
On March 11, 2020, Representatives Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) sent a letter to DHS seeking information on its plan for preventing and responding to a potential coronavirus outbreak in ICE and CBP migrant detention facilities and in the broader immigrant community.
BIA Holds Georgia Involuntary Manslaughter Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that involuntary manslaughter under Geo. Code Ann. 16-5-3(a) is not a CIMT because it requires only criminal negligence. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Kolubah, 3/11/20)
BIA Finds Exploitation of Elderly Persons in Florida Not an Aggravated Felony Theft Offense
Unpublished BIA decision holds that exploitation of an elderly person under Fla. Stat. 825.103(1) is not an aggravated felony theft offense because it does not include lack of consent as an element. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Joseph, 3/10/20)
CRS Releases Legal Sidebar on Immigration Enforcement and the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine
CRS released an updated legal sidebar summarizing litigation filed by several states and localities challenging the withholding of federal funds based on failure to comply with 8 U.S.C. §1373 and §1644 which require state and local entities to share information with federal immigration authorities.
DOJ Final Rule on DNA Collection from Immigration Detainees
DOJ final rule which gives the Attorney General plenary legal authority to direct DHS to collect DNA samples from immigration detainees. The rule is effective 4/8/20. (85 FR 13483, 3/9/20)
CA8 Upholds BIA’s Denial of Asylum to Mexican Petitioner with Schizophrenia
The court held that the record was not so substantial that a reasonable factfinder would conclude that Mexico’s government targets individuals who belong to the particular social group of “individuals with schizophrenia who exhibit erratic behavior.” (Perez-Rodriguez v. Barr, 3/9/20)
CA1 Upholds Denial of Motion to Reopen of Petitioner Who Feared Gang Violence in Guatemala
The court concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner’s motion to reopen on the grounds that he did not establish changed country conditions based on his fear of returning to Guatemala due to gang activity. (Molina v. Barr, 3/9/20)
ICE Releases Interim Reference Sheet on 2019-Novel Coronavirus
ICE released guidance for its Health Services Corps related to 2019-Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), including that medical staff should educate detainees on proper hygiene and requesting a sick call if ill as well as how to identify detainees with revised CDC criteria for COVID-19 exposure.
DOJ Authorizes DHS to Begin Collecting DNA Samples from Certain Immigration Detainees
DOJ issued a final rule to implement the Attorney General’s authority, provided by the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, to direct DHS to collect DNA samples from certain non-U.S. persons it detains. The DNA samples will be entered into the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS).
BIA Rules that Interpol Red Notices May Constitute Reliable Evidence of Serious Nonpolitical Crime
The BIA ruled that an Interpol Red Notice may constitute reliable evidence for the serious nonpolitical crime bar for asylum, and that violation of §345, Salvadoran Penal Code, is “serious” within meaning of the serious nonpolitical crime bar. Matter of W-E-R-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 795 (BIA 2020)
BIA Dismisses Charge of Conspiracy to Commit Fraud-Related Aggravated Felony
Unpublished BIA decision finds that respondent was not convicted of an aggravated felony under INA 101(a)(43)(U) where the IJ dismissed the corresponding charge under INA 101(a)(43)(M) because the loss to the victim was less than $10,000. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Gray, 3/6/20)
AILA DOS Liaison Q&As (3/5/20)
Official AILA/DOS liaison Q&As from a 3/5/20 meeting. Topics include: DOS Visa Office operations, the visa bulletin, NVC issues, international office closures, public charge issues, PP 9645 waivers, E visas, issues for those of Iranian descent, a final rule concerning “birth tourism,” and more.
CA8 Upholds BIA’s Denial of Asylum to Nigerian Petitioner Who Supported the Biafran State
The court denied the petition for review, holding that the BIA did not exceed its authority by ruling that the petitioner did not meet his burden of proof with corroborating evidence for his claimed fear of future harm in Nigeria on account of political opinion. (Uzodinma v. Barr, 3/5/20)
BIA Holds Georgia Domestic Violence Statute Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that simple battery family violence under Ga. Code Ann. 16-5-23(f) is not a CIMT. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Cooke, 3/5/20)
CA7 Finds BIA’s Analysis of Petitioner’s Request for a Remand Was Not Sufficient
The court held that the BIA failed to adequately consider and apply its own precedents when it determined that the petitioner was not entitled to a remand for the purpose of deciding whether her pending U visa application entitled her to a continuance. (Guerra Rocha, et al. v. Barr, 3/4/20)
AILA Urges the Fifth Circuit to Reject Matter of Mendoza-Hernandez
AILA submitted an amicus brief to the Fifth Circuit in Coulibaly v. Barr, arguing that the court should reject the BIA’s conclusion in Matter of Mendoza-Hernandez, 27 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2019), that the two-step process triggers the stop-time rule.
BIA Holds Ninth Circuit TPS Decision Constitutes Fundamental Change in Law
Unpublished BIA decision holds Ramirez v. Brown, 852 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2017), which held that TPS holders are deemed admitted for adjustment purposes, as a fundamental change in law sufficient to warrant reopening sua sponte. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Acevedo, 3/2/20)
HHS OIG Finds HHS Was Unprepared for the Zero-Tolerance Policy
HHS OIG found that poor interagency communication and management decisions left HHS unprepared for the zero-tolerance policy and impeded its ability to identify, care for, and reunify separated children. Care provider facilities also faced significant challenges during the reunification process.
Advocates File Lawsuit Against ICE’s New York Field Office Challenging “No-Release Policy” for Immigration-Related Arrests
New York Civil Liberties Union and Bronx Defenders filed a federal class action lawsuit against ICE’s New York Field Office challenging an alleged blanket policy of denying release and bond to virtually all persons arrested by immigration authorities. (Velesaca v. Decker, et al., 2/28/20)
BIA Finds Failure to Challenge Removability Constituted Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Unpublished BIA decision finds that respondent’s prior attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to argue that indecent exposure under Iowa Code 709.9 was not a CIMT. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Kahn, 2/28/20)
CA3 Finds Circumstances Surrounding Threats of Violence to Nicaraguan Petitioner Established Cumulative Pattern of Past Persecution
Where the petitioner, the leader of a political opposition group in Nicaragua, had been subjected to a pattern of threatening words and conduct by the ruling party, the court found she had suffered past persecution, even in the absence of physical harm. (Herrera-Reyes v. Att’y Gen., 2/28/20)
CA11 Holds Federal Anti-Trafficking Law Applies to Private, For-Profit Contractors Operating Immigration Detention Centers
The court held that the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) applies to private contractors operating federal immigration detention facilities, and that such contractors operating voluntary work programs may be liable for TVPA violations. (Barrientos, et al. v. Corecivic, Inc., 2/28/20)