Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
Think Immigration: Court Conundrum: Omaha Immigration Court Frequently Compromises Due Process Rights
In this blog post, Kelly Shanahan highlights an ACLU of Nebraska report detailing due process concerns in Omaha immigration hearings, and urging readers to tell Congress to remove EOIR from the Department of Justice and establish an Article 1 independent immigration court system.
Practice Advisory: Seeking Release of Clients Detained in Virginia Under Rodriguez Guerra v. Perry Settlement
The NIP, Amica Center, and the ACLU of Virginia provide a practice advisory on a proposed agreement in Rodriguez Guerra v. Perry, a class action challenging ICE ERO Washington Field Office's failure to abide by ICE's policy to immediately review the custody of certain detained individuals.
CA9 Vacates Grant of Habeas Petition After Finding District Court Erred in Exercising Jurisdiction over Petition
The court held that the district court erroneously exercised jurisdiction over the habeas petition, because the petitioner did not name his immediate custodian as the respondent and filed his complaint outside of the judicial district where he was confined. (Doe v. Garland, et al., 7/29/24)
CA5 Upholds Asylum Denial to Petitioner Who Alleged She Suffered State-Sponsored Persecution in Angola
The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s conclusion that the petitioner, who alleged that she had been persecuted by the Angolan government due to her father’s anti-corruption activities, had not suffered state-sponsored persecution. (L.N. v. Garland, 7/25/24)
Think Immigration: I Wish People Knew Our Immigration Laws Haven’t Aged Well
As part of our “One Thing” series, Sandra Feist highlights specific examples of how our immigration laws do not serve the interests of American businesses or communities well and calls on Congress to move forward with immigration reform that would be reflective of today’s realities.
CA3 Transfers Petitions for Review to Sixth Circuit After Finding IJ Completed Proceedings in Ohio
The court concluded that the IJ had completed the petitioner’s proceedings in Ohio, that venue was proper in the Sixth Circuit, and that it was in the interests of justice to transfer the three petitions for review to the Sixth Circuit. (Castillo v. Att’y Gen., 7/24/24)
CA9 Remands Asylum Claim for Reassessment of Credibility Ground as to Chinese Petitioner Allegedly Subjected to Forced Abortion
The court concluded that the agency’s credibility determination may have been affected by a misstatement of Chinese law that was a centerpiece of the government’s cross-examination of the petitioner at her removal hearing, and thus granted the petition for review. (Shen v. Garland, 7/24/24)
CA6 Holds That Substantial Evidence Supported Agency’s Denial of Hardship Waivers to Egyptian Petitioner
The court upheld the agency’s finding that the petitioner had not married in good faith or suffered extreme cruelty, and thus that she was ineligible for hardship waivers to the joint petition requirement to remove conditions on her permanent resident status. (Elgebaly v. Garland, 7/23/24)
CA7 Says It Lacks Jurisdiction to Review IJ’s Discretionary Denial of Mexican Petitioner’s Cancellation of Removal Application
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary decision to deny the petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(b)(1), and found that it lacked jurisdiction over the BIA’s review of that decision. (Sandoval Reynoso v. Garland, 7/23/24)
CA8 Finds Guatemalan Father of Three Children Failed to Satisfy Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship Standard
On remand from the Supreme Court, the court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that the petitioner had failed to satisfy the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard for purposes of cancellation of removal eligibility. (Gonzalez-Rivas v. Garland, 7/23/24)
CA9 Concludes That Petitioner Born in Mexico Was Not Eligible for Derivative Citizenship Based on INA §321(a)
The court determined that the petitioner was not eligible for derivative citizenship based on INA §321(a), and found that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s denial of Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. (Colin-Villavicencio v. Garland, 7/23/24)
EOIR 60-Day Notice of Comments on Form EOIR-29A
EOIR 60-day notice for comments on Form EOIR-29A, Notice of Motion To Reconsider/Reopen a Decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals From an Initial Decision of a DHS Officer. Comments are due by 9/23/24. (89 FR 59773, 7/23/24)
Former Immigration Judges Strongly Support the Strengthening Immigration Procedure's Act of 2024
The Round Table of Former Immigration Judges applauded Senator Murphy for introducing the Strengthening Immigration Procedures Act of 2024, which would bring the standard needed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel in immigration cases into alignment with every other area of law.
AILA Sends Letter to Ensure Consistency and Fairness in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Cases
AILA sent a letter to DOJ and DHS urging reform to the legal standard governing ineffective assistance of counsel claims in immigration matters.
Practice Alert: ICE Terminating Free Minutes for People in Detention
ICE is terminating the 520 free telephone minutes provided for people in detention during COVID-19. AILA members are encouraged to use ICE’s Virtual Attorney Visitation program and reminds members that they can request certain free phone calls under the PBNDS.
CA1 Finds Petitioner Who Experienced Harassment from Gang Members in El Salvador Failed to Show Membership in Valid PSG
The court concluded that the petitioner’s claimed particular social groups (PSGs)— “young person who has been beaten and threatened by gangs” and “young individual in the country who’s been targeted for gang recruitment” —were not cognizable. (Ramos-Gutierrez v. Garland, 7/18/24)
CA1 Remands Withholding of Removal Claim of Petitioner Who Fled Liberia as a Child During Civil War
The court held that the BIA and IJ had failed to address whether the petitioner’s childhood escape from Liberia because of systematic ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Krahn people during the Liberian civil war constituted past persecution. (Paye v. Garland, 7/17/24)
CA2 Upholds Asylum Denial to Nepalese Petitioner Who Received Death Threats from Maiost Partisans
The court held that death threats are not per se indicative of past persecution, and found that the death threats directed at the petitioner were not sufficiently imminent, concrete, or menacing so as to constitute past persecution under the case-by-case approach. (KC v. Garland, 7/17/24)
CA2 Finds That IJ and BIA Properly Admitted Form I-213 into Evidence as Reliable Document
The court held that the IJ and BIA properly considered the Form I-213 prepared by immigration officials, because it was presumptively reliable and capable of proving alienage by clear and convincing evidence, and the petitioner did not rebut that presumption. (Vera Punin v. Garland, 7/16/24)
CA4 Finds Petitioner Was Not Eligible for Cancellation of Removal Based on His Conviction for Soliciting Prostitution in Virginia
The court held that petitioner’s conviction for soliciting prostitution in Virginia was a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and thus that petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal pursuant to INA §240A(b)(1) based on his prior conviction. (Ortega-Cordova v. Garland, 7/16/24)
CA8 Upholds Asylum Denial Where Petitioner Claimed Past Persecution Based on Her Daughter’s Medical Treatment in Guatemala
The court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that the petitioner had not established past persecution, where she alleged that she was persecuted by hospital staff at a government-run hospital in Guatemala where she would take her daughter, who had a genetic disorder. (Calvo-Tino v. Garland, 7/12/24)
CA11 Upholds Denial of Yemeni Petitioner’s Request for Administrative Closure or Continuance
The court found that it lacked jurisdiction over the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to remand, and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for an administrative closure or a continuance. (Alkotof v. Att’y Gen., 7/12/24)
CA9 Finds That Petitioner’s Nevada Conviction for Attempted Lewdness with Child under 14 Constitutes Attempted Aggravated Felony
The court held that the offense of attempted lewdness with a child under the age of 14, in violation of Nev. Rev. Stat. §§193.330 and 201.230(2), constitutes an attempted sexual abuse of a minor aggravated felony that rendered the petitioner removable. (Leon Perez v. Garland, 6/28/24)
CA11 Finds That Petitioner Was Properly Ordered Removed in Absentia Where She Provided an Erroneous Address and Failed to Correct It
The court held that because the petitioner had provided the government with an inaccurate address at which she could be reached and failed to correct it, immigration officials were excused from providing her notice of her removal hearing. (Rosales-Mendez v. Att’y Gen., 6/20/24)
CA2 Finds Petitioner’s Ground of Removal Was Insufficiently Related to His Marriage Fraud to Support INA §237(a)(1)(H) Waiver
The court upheld the BIA’s determination that petitioner could not invoke INA §237(a)(1)(H)’s fraud waiver to waive his charge of removability, because his conditional permanent resident status terminated automatically due to his failure to submit a joint petition. (Bador v. Garland, 7/11/24)