Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
BIA Finds IJ Erred in Denying Continuance Based on Priority Date Retrogression
The BIA sustains appeal and grants motion to remand after IJ denied request for continuance due to visa retrogression, remanding for additional fact finding as to whether the respondent was grandfathered under section 245(i) Courtesy of Christopher Helt.
CBP Releases Memo and Muster on Temporary I-551 ADIT Stamp for Paroled LPRs
CBP released a memo and muster on temporary I-551 ADIT stamp for LPRs paroled for completion of inspection or released for removal hearing. The documents are entirely redacted.
Attorney General to Review Right to Effective Counsel
The Attorney General directed the BIA to refer to him for review three cases involving Lozada standards with respect to ineffective assistance to counsel and requested amici briefs on several related issues.
CA8 Holds No Constitutional Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel
The court held that there was no constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment to effective assistance of counsel in removal proceedings and that the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it refused to reopen Petitioner’s asylum case.(Rafiyev v. Mukasey, 8/5/08)
ICE Announces Program to Ask People to Turn Themselves In
ICE announces a pilot program it dubs "Scheduled Departure" to ask those with final orders of deportation to turn themselves in for removal.
ICE in the Realm of the Bizarre
Yesterday’s announcement by ICE of a program to encourage the undocumented to report for deportation is the latest bit of strangeness in the increasing loss of rationality in the way the U.S. deals with immigration.
CA8 Upholds Denial of Withholding Based on Fear of FGM to US Citizen Child
The court held that a parent may not bring a derivative claim for withholding based upon the fact that her child would be subjected to future persecution. (Gumaneh v. Mukasey, 8/1/08)
CA1 Affirms EAJA Award Finding No Substantial Justification in Natz Delay
The court held that the delay in adjudicating Plaintiff’s naturalization and failure to expedite the application in an attempt to comply with the 120-day statutory directive was not substantially justified. (Aronov v. Chertoff, 8/1/08)
Immigration Law Advisor, July 2008 (Vol. 2, No. 7)
Immigration Law Advisor, an EOIR legal publication, with an article on bond proceedings before IJs and the BIA, federal court activity for June 2008, an article on the REAL ID Act in the circuit courts, BIA precedent decisions, and a regulatory update.
Railroad Justice Run Amok
As more information about the Postville, Iowa raid on the Agriprocessors facility comes to light, it is apparent that this was a travesty of justice that could not have occurred without the full complicity of the federal district court for the northern district of Iowa.
BIA Finds Applicant Not “Lawfully Resided” for Purposes of 212(h) Waiver
The BIA held that respondent had not “lawfully resided” in the U.S. for purposes of qualifying for a 212(h) waiver during any periods where he was an applicant for asylum or adjustment and lacked any other basis on which to claim lawful residence. Matter of Rotimi, 24 I&N Dec. 567 (BIA 2008)
BIA Dismisses Appeal Further Limiting Definition of Particular Social Group
The BIA agreed with the Immigration Judge who found that Salvadoran youth who refused recruitment into the MS-13 criminal gang or their family members does not constitute a particular social group. Matter of S-E-G-, et al., 24 I&N Dec. 579 (BIA 2008)
EOIR Proposes Changes to Standards of Representation and Professional Conduct
EOIR proposes to change the rules and procedures concerning the standards of representation and professional conduct for attorneys and other practitioners who appear before the EOIR. Comments are due by September 29, 2008. (73 FR 44178, 7/30/08)
EOIR Publishes Proposed Rule on Professional Conduct for Practitioners
EOIR published a proposed rule to change the rules and procedures concerning standards of representation and professional conduct for attorneys and practitioners appearing before immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals. (73 FR 44280, 7/30/08)
EOIR Offers Guidance for Judges on Attorney Telephonic Appearances
An Operating Policies and Procedures Memorandum (OPPM) providing guidance for judges regarding requests for telephonic appearances by attorneys and representatives at master calendar and bond redetermination hearing has been released.
Stakeholder/USCIS Q & As (7/29/08)
The Q&As address I-730s, withholding or removal, 245i eligibility, I-130s, T visas, Special Immigrant Visas, adjustment of status, Refund of fees, asylum, N-400s, RFEs, humanitarian parole, HPV vaccine, and more.
Aytes Memo on Discretionary Exemptions to Terrorist Activity Inadmissibility Grounds
A 7/28/08 memo from Michael Aytes, Acting Deputy Director, USCIS, on the discretionary authority of the DHS and DOS Secretaries to exempt the effect of a foreign national’s terrorist activities on admissibility or removability.
CA10 Reverses Finding of No Past Persecution in Case of Armenian Journalist
CA10t reversed the finding that Petitioner’s mistreatment amounted to no more than hostile actions by people adversely affected by the news media, holding that official retaliation against one who threatens to expose govt corruption may amount to persecution. (Hayrapetyan v. Mukasey, 7/28/08)
OIG Confirms Politicized Hiring of IJs and BIA Members
The DOJ’s OIG released a report entitled, “An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General,” confirming that political and ideological considerations were use in the hiring of immigration judges and BIA members.
National Immigrant Bond Fund
Information on the newly launched National Immigrant Bond Fund, which seeks to reaffirm the values of dignity and due process by assisting immigrants swept up in ICE raids to post bond quickly in order to secure a fair hearing in Immigration Court.
CA9 Addresses Prolonged Detention and Opportunity for a Bond Hearing under INA §1226(a)
CA9 remands because it could not determine whether a bond hearing had been afforded, due to an inadequate record. It held that the detention was permissible under INA §1226(a), but that the AG is required to provide an opportunity to challenge the detention. (Casas-Castrillon v. DHS, 7/25/08)
CA9 Upholds Denial of Habeas Claim as Petitioner Failed to Establish Indefinite Detention
CA9 held that where a removal order is administratively final, but removal is stayed for a petition for review, detention is authorized. It rejected a Zadvydas challenge because the petitioner’s detention end date was uncertain but not indefinite. (Prieto-Romero v. Clark, 7/25/08)
CA7 Finds that Denial of Continuance Renders Statutory Opportunity to Seek Adjustment a "Mere Illusion"
CA7 remanded, finding that the IJ’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain adjustment applications was not a rational basis for denying the continuance request, and that the denial nullified the statutory right to apply for adjustment under the circumstances of the case. (Ceta v. Mukasey, 7/25/08)
Testimony from AILA During House Hearing on Immigration Raids
Testimony of AILA First Vice President David Leopold during the 7/24/08 House Immigration Subcommittee hearing on recent immigration work place raids.
CA9 Defines “One Central Reason” in Mixed-Motive Asylum Claim
CA9 held that previous mixed-motive jurisprudence is superseded by the REAL ID Act and the new “one central reason” standard. It defined a “central” reason as of primary importance to the persecutors, essential to their decision, and a cause of their’ act. (Parussimova v. Mukasey, 7/24/08)