AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 21091502 | Dated September 13, 2021 | File Size: 821 KDownload the Document
The court first held that USCIS’s issuance of the new bona fide determination (BFD) process for victims of qualifying crimes did not moot the plaintiffs’ case, and that federal courts may review the plaintiffs’ claims that USCIS has unreasonably delayed placing principal petitioners on the U visa waitlist and adjudicating pre-waitlist work authorization applications. The court next found that federal courts may compel USCIS to place principal petitioners on the U visa waitlist when an unreasonable delay has occurred per 5 USC §706(1). Further, the court concluded that §706(1) allows the federal courts to command USCIS to hasten an unduly delayed BFD, and that the plaintiffs had sufficiently pleaded that USCIS has unreasonably delayed the principal petitioners’ placement on the U visa waitlist. Finally, the court determined that the plaintiffs should be allowed to amend their complaints should they wish to challenge any delayed BFDs. (Barrios Garcia et al. v. DHS et al., 9/13/21)
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 21091502.Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.