AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 22032431 | Dated March 29, 2022 | File Size: 1728 KDownload the Document
DHS and DOJ interim final rule (IFR) on asylum processing. The IFR significantly changes the regulations governing the processing of asylum claims by individuals subject to expedited removal. The IFR is effective 5/31/22. The IFR states that DHS and DOJ are soliciting further public comment; comments will be accepted until 5/31/22 and will be considered and addressed in a final rule. Comments on proposed revisions to the Form I-765 instructions will also be accepted until 5/31/22. (87 FR 18078, 3/29/22)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 208, 212, and 235
[CIS No. 2692–21; DHS Docket No. USCIS– 2021–0012]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for Immigration Review
8 CFR Parts 1003, 1208, 1235, and 1240
[A.G. Order No. 5369–2022]
Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers
AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 22032431.Open the Document
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.