AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20121030 | Dated December 11, 2020 | File Size: 880 KDownload the Document
DHS and DOJ final rule making multiple changes to the regulations governing the procedures for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The final rule adopts the notice of proposed rulemaking published at 85 FR 36264 on 6/15/20 with few substantive changes. The rule is effective 1/11/21. (85 FR 80274, 12/11/20)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 208 and 235
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for Immigration Review
8 CFR Parts 1003, 1208, and 1235
[EOIR Docket No. 18–0102; A.G. Order No. 4922–2020]
Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security; Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20121030.Open the Document
Track selected proposed and promulgated changes to immigration-related regulations and the current status of each change made during the last two years of the Trump administration.Track Changes Now
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.