AILA's Featured Issues pages provide a one-stop shop on current immigration-related issues that AILA is actively tracking. This includes government actions and resources, AILA's policy recommendations, and materials and talking points to engage with Congress and the press.Start Your Research
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 18051749 | Dated May 17, 2018 | File Size: 559 KDownload the Document
In a case he had previously referred to himself for review, the attorney general held that IJs and the BIA have no general authority for administrative closure. Accordingly, IJs and the BIA may only administratively close a case where a previous regulation or a previous judicially approved settlement expressly authorizes such an action. Where a case has been administratively closed without such authority, the IJ or the BIA shall recalendar the case on the motion of either party. Matter of Avetisyan, 25 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2012), and Matter of W-Y-U-, 27 I&N Dec. 17 (BIA 2017) are overruled. Matter of Castro-Tum, 27 I&N Dec. 271 (A.G. 2018)
[[To print the PDF on this page please use the print function in the PDF reader.]]
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 18051749.Open the Document