AILA Quicktake #275: New DHS Regulation Eliminates Protections for Children and Families
8/30/19
AILA Doc. No. 19083010.
Detention & Bond, Humanitarian Parole, Removal & Relief, Unaccompanied Children
On 8/23/19, DHS issued a regulation that would reverse the protections of the Flores Settlement Agreement, which is a decades-old court settlement put in place to ensure the safety and proper care of minors in immigration detention. Katy Murdza, Dilley Pro Bono Project’s Advocacy Manager, discusses how this new regulation will impact children and families in government custody.
Video Transcript
0:00:00.000–0:00:08.460
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security issued a regulation
0:00:08.460–0:00:12.280
that would reverse the protections of the decades-old Flores Settlement Agreement,
0:00:12.280–0:00:16.840
which was created to ensure the safety and well-being of children in immigration detention.
0:00:16.840–0:00:21.130
As it stands, the Flores Settlement requires the government to release children
0:00:21.130–0:00:25.500
in its custody as quickly as possible, generally within 20 days.
0:00:25.500–0:00:27.600
The new rule will terminate this agreement,
0:00:27.600–0:00:30.940
allowing the indefinite detention of children and families.
0:00:30.940–0:00:34.640
Furthermore, the facilities that detain these children and families would no longer
0:00:34.640–0:00:38.680
need a license from state agencies with expertise in child welfare,
0:00:38.680–0:00:42.160
meaning that the immigration agencies will set standards for the very facilities
0:00:42.160–0:00:44.820
they are operating, without any external oversight.
0:00:44.820–0:00:48.300
This change is especially concerning because DHS has repeatedly shown
0:00:48.300–0:00:51.980
its inability to to maintain conditions that protect those in its custody.
0:00:56.740–0:00:59.880
As shown by recent reports of child deaths, overcrowding,
0:00:59.880–0:01:01.700
and inadequate medical care,
0:01:01.700–0:01:05.360
the Dilley Pro Bono Project, a site of the Immigration Justice Campaign,
0:01:05.360–0:01:09.540
already sees the disturbing consequences of family detention every day.
0:01:09.540–0:01:12.180
Mothers reports delays and denial of medical care,
0:01:12.180–0:01:16.320
gaps in prescription medication, and failure to accommodate medical diets.
0:01:16.330–0:01:20.670
No specialists including OBGYNs are on-site in Dilley,
0:01:20.670–0:01:24.040
despite the detention of people with medical conditions and pregnant women.
0:01:24.040–0:01:26.320
Children’s mental health quickly deteriorates,
0:01:26.320–0:01:31.040
and many refuse to eat or regress to behaviors that they have previously outgrown.
0:01:31.040–0:01:34.282
Detention prevents families from accessing the evidence, witnesses,
0:01:34.282–0:01:38.890
and attorneys they need to have a fair chance at fighting their asylum claim.
0:01:38.890–0:01:41.840
These problems occur when families are detained for just a few weeks,
0:01:41.840–0:01:44.820
but are much worse when families are detained for months.
0:01:44.820–0:01:48.440
We saw this first hand last year, when 37 mothers and their children
0:01:48.440–0:01:50.800
who had been separated by the Trump administration
0:01:50.800–0:01:54.580
were later reunifed and brought to Dilley for four months.
0:01:57.420–0:02:01.700
Before the rule goes into effect in October 22nd, 2019,
0:02:01.700–0:02:05.200
Federal Judge Dolly Gee will hear arguments on whether the new rule
0:02:05.200–0:02:07.659
meets the terms of the original settlement.
0:02:07.660–0:02:10.840
Other challenges to this rule are expected since the new regulations
0:02:10.840–0:02:13.080
differ so much from the original agreement
0:02:13.080–0:02:17.600
and arguably completely undermine both its terms and spirit.
0:02:17.600–0:02:20.780
If this rule goes into effect it will funnel billions in taxpayer dollars
0:02:20.780–0:02:23.640
into private prisons in order to jail children and families
0:02:23.640–0:02:28.100
despite the existence of more effective and humane alternatives.
0:02:28.100–0:02:30.480
Data shows that alternatives to detention
0:02:30.480–0:02:32.700
like the DHS Family Case Management Program
0:02:32.700–0:02:35.360
have a near perfect, 99 percent, appearance rate
0:02:35.361–0:02:37.799
and are more cost-efficient than detention.
0:02:37.800–0:02:41.360
Rather than attempting to detain families for longer periods of time
0:02:41.360–0:02:44.040
the government should invest in alternatives to detention,
0:02:44.040–0:02:46.900
and do everything in its power to ensure the safety and well-being
0:02:46.900–0:02:48.880
of children under its custody.
Related Resources
- DHS and HHS Final Rule Amending the Regulations Relating to Custody of Minors (84 FR 44392, 8/23/19)