Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements
AILF Q&AS on Succar v. Ashcroft
In a landmark decision in Succar v. Ashcroft, the First Circuit ruled that 8 C.F.R. § 245.1(c)(8) was invalid because it was inconsistent with the clear intent of Congress in INA § 245(a) to allow parolees to adjust status. AILF prepared Q&As on how others might benefit from this decision.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 16123070.
Related Resources
- CA1 Strikes Down Arriving Alien Adjustment Regulation
(Succar v. Ashcroft, 1/5/05)