Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
USCIS Guidance on Immediate Family Members in Credible Fear Process
USCIS memo from John Lafferty, Chief of the Asylum Division, with guidance on who is considered an immediate family member in the credible fear process, credible fear determination for immediate family members, and linking related family members in the Asylum Pre-Screening System.
CA1 Finds BIA Committed Legal Error on “On Account of” Element of Guatemalan Asylum Claim
The court found the factual record did not preclude and would even allow the BIA to find that petitioners were members of a particular social group by virtue of their family relationship, without any need to show a further protected ground. (Aldana-Ramos v. Holder, 6/27/14, amended 8/8/14)
Getting a Little Serious about the Need for Immigration Reform
This is a post adapted from my speech last week in accepting an award from AILA for outstanding contributions made as a young lawyer in the field of immigration and nationality law. While the occasion was a happy one and I was honored to receive that award, I took the opportunity, as I do here, [
BIA Finds FGM Constitutes Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship
Unpublished BIA decision grants cancellation of removal upon finding respondent’s U.S. citizen daughters would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship in Senegal by being subject to female genital mutilation (FGM). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of K-C-, 6/23/14)
AILA Quicktake #84: Announcement on Increased Family Detention Facilities
AILA's Second Vice President Annaluisa Padilla sits down to discuss the Obama administration's announcement to open additional detention facilities to address the humanitarian crisis at the border.
AILA: Increasing Detention Won’t Solve Humanitarian Crisis
AILA President Leslie A. Holman responded to the Obama Administration’s announcement that the detention of families will increase saying, “Frankly, I’m surprised at this because I believe that our country’s values center on protecting families, and these particular families are so very vulnerable.”
CA5 Upholds Asylum Denial for Eritrean Petitioner
The court denied the petition for review, holding that punishment for violation of conscription laws of general applicability does not in itself constitute “persecution” on account of political opinion under INA §101(a)(42)(A). (Milat v. Holder, 6/19/14)
Responding to the Increase in Child Migrants: We’ve Managed These Crises Before
In my first week as an immigration lawyer, 286 Chinese migrants waded ashore in Queens, and a significant number were detained at a county prison near me in York, Pennsylvania. In 1993, there was no significant infrastructure for handling those hundreds of cases in the Northeast - no detention faci
CA6 Remands to BIA, Finding IJ Erred in Interpreting §208(a)(2)(D)
The court disagreed with the IJ’s interpretation, finding nothing in §208(a)(2)(D) requiring an applicant show he was ineligible for asylum when he arrived in the U.S. before using “changed circumstances” to extend the deadline for filing an application. (Mandebvu v. Holder, 6/18/14)
CA7 Denies Withholding of Removal to Chinese Christian in Indonesia
The court denied the petition for review, finding petitioner failed to meet the test for withholding, did not show a pattern or practice of persecution of Chinese Christians in Indonesia, nor could he establish his personal fear of persecution was reasonable. (Halim v. Holder, 6/17/14)
Letter to the Chief of USCIS Asylum Division on Asylum Division Officer Training Course Lesson Plan
A 6/16/14 letter from AILA and over 50 other organizations and law professors to John Lafferty, Chief of USCIS Asylum Division, requesting revisions to the Asylum Division Officer Training Course Lesson Plan, Credible Fear of Persecution and Torture Determinations, and the accompanying memorandum.
USCIS Memo on TRIG Exemption for the Tigray People’s Liberation Front
USCIS policy memo on the implementation of exercised discretionary authority not to apply most terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG) to certain aliens for voluntary activities or associations related to the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF).
USCIS Memo on TRIG Exemption for the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Party
USCIS policy memo on the implementation of exercised discretionary authority not to apply most terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG) to certain aliens for voluntary activities or associations related to the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Party (EPRP).
USCIS Memo on TRIG Exemption for the Eritrean Liberation Front
USCIS policy memo on the implementation of exercised discretionary authority not to apply most terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG) to certain aliens for voluntary activities or associations related to the Eritrean Liberation Front (ELF).
USCIS Memo on TRIG Exemption for the Democratic Movement for the Liberation of Eritrean Kunama
USCIS policy memo on the implementation of exercised discretionary authority not to apply most terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG) to certain aliens for voluntary activities or associations related to the Democratic Movement for the Liberation of Eritrean Kunama (DMLEK).
CA9 Upholds Adverse Credibility Determination in Asylum Case for Chinese Christian
The panel held the inconsistency between the asylum declaration, in which petitioner recounted physical abuse during detention, and her failure to testify about that abuse until she was prompted, was sufficient to support the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. (Jiang v. Holder, 6/12/14
BIA Holds Asylum Applicant Does Not Need to Establish Prima Facie Eligibility To Obtain Merits Hearing
The Board held that an applicant for asylum or withholding of removal is entitled to a hearing on the merits without first having to establish prima facie eligibility for the requested relief. Matter of E-F-H-L, 26 I&N Dec. 319 (BIA 2014)
USCIS Memo Requiring Positive Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Determinations as Part of Quality Assurance Review
USCIS memo, from John Lafferty, Chief of the Asylum Division, implementing changes to the categories of credible fear and reasonable fear cases requiring Quality Assurance review, now requiring pre-decisional review from a random sampling of both positive and negative determinations.
CA8 Affirms Adjudicatory Delay in Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds (TRIG) Case
The court found USCIS’ less than five-year delay in adjudicating the adjustment application reasonable, as prior to the TRIG exemption policy which had kept it on hold, petitioner was inadmissible for providing material support to a terrorist organization. (Irshad v. Holder, 6/11/14)
BIA Remands Humanitarian Asylum Claim for IJ to Consider “Other Serious Harm” in Haiti
Unpublished BIA decision remanding for further fact finding and a new analysis of respondent’s request for humanitarian asylum, finding the IJ did not consider the claim through the “other serious harm” framework discussed in Matter of L-S-. Courtesy of Disna M. Weerasinghe.
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order of Respondent with Credible Fear
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds an in absentia removal order against respondent who diligently sought reopening and was found to have a credible fear of persecution. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Aguilera, 6/6/14)
CA8 Upholds Asylum Denial for Petitioner Fearing FGM in Kenya
The court found that the petitioner did not prove prejudice when her hearing was conducted without the presence of counsel, because neither she nor her counsel set forth what evidence affirmatively proved that she was entitled to relief. (Njoroge v. Holder, 6/3/14)
DOJ OIL June 2014 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for June 2014, with articles on the Supreme Court’s decision in Scialabba v. Osorio, the CSPA, and post-parole convictions, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for June 2014 and monthly topical parentheticals.
CA8 Declines to Review MTR for Chinese Petitioner with Forced Sterilization Claim
The court declined to review the motion to reopen (MTR) denial, finding that petitioner did not produce previously unavailable documents and that they did not distinguish between women who have had children in China and those who return with children born abroad. (Chen v. Holder, 5/13/14)
CA9 Upholds Asylum Denial for Sikh Petitioner from India
The court denied the petition for review, upholding the BIA’s determination that there had been a fundamental change in circumstances such that the Sikh petitioner’s life would not be threatened on account of a protected ground if removed to India. (Singh v. Holder, 5/21/14)