Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
DOS Releases 2007 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
On 3/11/08 DOS released the 2007 Reports on Human Rights Practices. The 196 reports are submitted to Congress in compliance with the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.
BIA Grants Asylum to Ethnic Chin from Burma in Material Support Bar Case
The BIA held that, for purposes of INA §212(a)(3)(B), the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 provides that certain groups, including the Chin National Front (CNF), are not to be classified as “terrorist organizations.” Matter of S-K-, 24 I&N Dec. 475 (BIA 2008)
CA2 Remands Asylum Case Due to Confidentiality Breach and False Documents
The court held that the BIA erred in concluding that the government had not violated the confidentiality regulation when it disclosed Petitioner’s name to the Macedonian authorities. (Corovic v. Mukasey, 3/7/08)
USCIS Publishes Comment Request on HRIFA Supplement to I-485
USCIS information collection on Supplement C, HRIFA Supplement to Form I-485. Comments are due 4/7/08. (73 FR 12458, 3/7/08)
CA9 Remands Asylum One-Year Deadline Issue of Age of Minors to BIA
The court noted that regulations do not define whether individuals under 21 years of age are “minors” under 8 CFR §1208.4(a)(5)(ii). The court stated that when the BIA has not considered an issue in the first instance, the proper course of action is to remand it. (Al-Mousa v. Mukasey, 3/5/08)
DHS Testimony at Oversight Hearing on Homeland Security
Testimony of DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff before the House Committee on the Judiciary at an Oversight Hearing on the Department of Homeland Security.
BIA Finds Respondents Subjected to FGM Eligible for Asylum
The BIA held that a Somali mother and daughter who were subjected to female genital mutilation were eligible for asylum based on humanitarian grounds regardless of whether they can establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. Matter of S-A-K- and H-A-H-, 24 I&N Dec. 464 (BIA 2008)
AILA Liaison/NSC Q & As on Refugee Asylee Issues (2/28/08)
The 02/28/2008 Q & As address procedures for obtaining duplicate I-765 denial notices, I-131s for refugee and asylees, I-730s denied due to failure to respond to an RFE, Refugee cases and Aytes 02/04/2008 national security checks memo, and other issues.
Stakeholder/USCIS Q & As (2/26/2008)
The Q & As address fee waiver rejections, Iraqi and Afghan Special Immigrant applicants for adjustment of status, I-730s, Asylee EADS and security checks, refugee travel documents and re-entry permit, I-129 extension cases, and more.
CA1 Finds Jurisdiction to Review One-Year Deadline; Denies Asylum
The court found that the asylum application was timely when the deadline fell on a Sunday and the applicant mailed her application the next day. However, it also found that she had not shown past persecution or a well-founded fear. (Jorgji v. Mukasey, 2/24/08)
CA10 Upholds Adverse Credibility Finding Due to Omissions on Asylum Form
The court found that if the torture Petitioner described actually occurred, it would defy common sense for Petitioner, who was assisted by counsel, to omit any mention of it in his application and supplemental letters. (Ismaiel v. Mukasey, 2/22/08)
CA4 Remands for Determination of Whether IUD Insertion is Persecution
CA4 noted that the BIA had not issued a precedent decision addressing the forced insertion and continued usage of an IUD as constituting persecution. The court faulted the BIA for its cursory conclusion, finding that the BIA had given it nothing to review. (Lin v. Mukasey, 2/20/08)
CA8 Rejects W/H for Lack of Credibility; Finds Ineligibility to Adjust
The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review the timeliness of Petitioner’s asylum claim,upheld denial of withholding based on lack of credibility, and held that he was ineligible to adjust based on his VWP entry. (Zine v. Mukasey, 2/19/08)
CA4 Holds CAT Factual Findings Not Reviewable; Adjustment Unavailable
CA4 found that it lacked jurisdiction to review the CAT claim because the issue on appeal was a factual determination by the BIA. The court held that Petitioner, who entered as a refugee and previously adjusted status, was unable to adjust status again. (Saintha v. Mukasey, 2/14/08)
CA1 Upholds Adverse Credibility Finding in Cambodian Asylum Claim
While the IJ arguably overstated the number and importance of the inconsistencies, the court held that the IJ had a rational basis for the adverse credibility finding. (Teng v. Mukasey, 2/14/08)
CA9 Remands Frivolousness Finding for BIA to Apply Matter of Y-L- Factors
The court remanded the BIA’s frivolous asylum application finding to allow the BIA to apply the procedural guidelines set forth in Matter of Y-L-, a precedent decision issued 5 months after the frivolousness finding in Petitioner’s case. (Kalilu v. Mukasey, 2/14/08)
BIA Says Burden Shifts to DHS After Asylum Applicant Establishes Past Persecution
The BIA held that, once an asylum applicant has established past persecution, the burden shifts to DHS to prove country conditions have changed, or the applicant could avoid future persecution by relocating, and it would be reasonable to do so. Matter of D-I-M-, 24 I&N Dec. 448 (BIA 2008)
CA1 Finds BIA Did Not Conduct Improper Factfinding in Asylum Case
The court held that the IJ resolved the issue of past persecution and that the BIA did not impugn the IJ’s factual finding, but simply explained why it was supportable. (Rotinsulu v. Mukasey, 2/8/08)
Scialabba Memo on Authority to Grant Asylum in Expedited Removal Process
Memo from Lori Scialabba, Associate Director, Refugee, Asylum, and Int'l Operations Directorate, USCIS, in response to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom’s recommendation that asylum officers be given the authority to grant asylum at the time of the credible fear interview.
CA9 Amends Grigoryan Decision; Instructs BIA to Grant MTR
The court amended its 11/19/07 decision regarding ineffective assistance of counsel in an asylum case by an Armenian-Turkish woman harmed in Azerbaijan, finding that the BIA erred in failing to presume prejudice and abused its discretion in denying the MTR. (Grigoryan v. Mukasey, 2/5/08)
USCIS Memo: Revised National Security Adjudication and Reporting Requirements
This February 4, 2008, USCIS Michael Aytes memorandum modifies existing guidance regarding background and security checks on applicants, petitioners and beneficiaries seeking certain immigration benefits.
DOS Briefing on Iraqi Refugee and Special Immigrant Visa Admissions
DOS and DHS held a briefing on 2/5/08 on developments in the Iraqi Refugee and Special Immigrant Visa admissions programs.
Immigration Law Advisor, January 2008 (Vol. 2, No. 1)
Immigration Law Advisor, an EOIR legal publication, with an article on Brand X deference, federal court activity for December 2007, an article on “frivolousness” in asylum adjudications, update on recent BIA precedent decisions, a legislative commentary on CIR, and a regulatory update.
CA2 Remands Frivolous Finding where Applicant Recanted before Final Decision
The court remanded where the applicant admitted filing a materially false asylum application, but withdrew it before the IJ made a final determination on the application. (Zheng v. Mukasey, 2/1/08)
CA1 Finds No Due Process Violation; Upholds Negative Credibility Finding
The court held that the BIA did not err in remanding Petitioner’s case to the same IJ where there was no allegation of misconduct, and found nothing improper about the IJ’s conduct at the second hearing. (Yosd v. Mukasey, 1/29/08)