Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
CA11 Rejects Togolese Asylum Claim Based on Brief Detention
The court sua sponte vacated its earlier decision, making no substantive changes. The court upheld the BIA’s finding that Petitioner failed to establish that his 36-hour detention amounted to past persecution. (Djonda v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 1/22/08)
CA11 Finds Persecutor Bar Applies to Guard at Forced Abortion Facility
The court held that the standard for determining whether an applicant is ineligible for asylum and withholding due to assistance or participation in persecution is whether his or her conduct was active, direct and integral to the underlying persecution. (Chen v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 1/17/08)
CA9 Amends Kalouma Decision re: Proof of Identity in Asylum Claims
In response to a petition for rehearing by the government, the court amended its 08/28/07 decision (AILA Doc. No. 07101260) with a few additional paragraphs of analysis. The court rejected the government’s reliance on Farah v. Ashcroft. (Kalouma v. Gonzales, 1/15/08)
CA7 Finds IJ “Cared Little about the Evidence” in Nigerian CAT Claim
The court found that the flaws in the IJ’s reasoning made it question the fairness of the hearing, and that the IJ failed to consider rebuttal evidence regarding whether Petitioner’s crimes were aggravated felonies. (Bosede v. Mukasey, 1/14/08)
CA11 Finds “Courage Does Not Negate Fear” in Colombian Asylum Claim
The court vacated the IJ’s finding that Petitioner, a Colombian lawyer, failed to show a well-founded fear. The court found that she had shown past persecution and was entitled to a rebuttable presumption. (Santamaria v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 1/11/08)
IJ’s Decision Must Contain Explicit Order of Removal When Withholding Granted Without Asylum
The BIA held that when an IJ issues a decision granting an alien’s application for withholding of removal, without a grant of asylum, the decision must include an explicit order of removal. Matter of I-S- & C-S-, 24 I&N Dec. 432 (BIA 2008)
CA1 Holds Attempted Conscription by FARC Is Not a Basis for Asylum
The court held that coercive conscription by the FARC did not trigger an entitlement to asylum, where conscription might be motivated by the desire to fill their ranks and the target might resist for non-political motives. (Tobon-Marin v. Mukasey, 1/8/08)
CA7 Denied Claim Based on Identity Theft and Failure to Prove Homosexuality
The court held that Petitioner’s convictions for identity theft were properly characterized as aggravated felonies. It also rejected his withholding claim based on homosexuality, due to incredible testimony and lack of corroborating evidence. (Eke v. Mukasey, 1/7/08)
Immigration Law Advisor, December 2007 (Vol. 1, No. 12)
Immigration Law Advisor, an EOIR legal publication, with an article on gang violence and asylum, federal court activity for November 2007, update on recent BIA precedent decisions, and a regulatory update.
CA6 Upholds IJ’s Frivolousness Finding in Albanian Asylum Claim
The court found that Petitioner received adequate warning about the consequences of filing of frivolous asylum applications and had sufficient opportunity to account for discrepancies in his various applications. (Ceraj v. Mukasey, 12/28/07)
CA9 Rejects Withholding and CAT Claim of Salvadoran Gang Member
The court rejected Petitioner’s argument that his indelible gang tattoos and former membership in a gang would qualify as a particular social group. (Arteaga v. Mukasey, 12/27/07)
CA6 Upholds Findings of No Nexus and Changed Conditions in Guatemala
The court declined to resolve the issue of whether an imputed political opinion may be the basis for an asylum claim, finding that Petitioner failed to establish that his persecutors had acted on account of his opinion, imputed or otherwise.(Pascual v. Mukasey, 12/19/07)
CA2 Overturns Adverse Credibility Finding Due to Speculation Over Documents
The court held that the IJ’s speculation regarding Petitioner’s identity document from Mauritania and refugee document from Senegal could not support an adverse credibility finding. (Niang v. Mukasey, 12/19/07)
CA3 Overturns Negative Credibility Finding in Burmese Asylum Case
The court held that the IJ failed to elaborate on her reasons for finding that Petitioner’s political activities in Japan and in Burma were not enough to meet the well-founded fear standard. (Thu v. Att’y Gen. of U.S., 12/18/07)
CA9 Rejects MTR Asylum Claim Based on Changed Conditions in Iran
The court held that because the IJ had found Petitioner’s conversion was not genuine and that apostasy would not be imputed to him, the BIA did not abuse its discretion. (Toufighi v. Mukasey, 12/13/07)
CA8 Rejects Breach of Confidentiality Claim; Finds No Asylum Disclosure
The court held that the breach of confidentiality claim failed because there was no evidence the INS disclosed any information in the asylum application to Uzbek officials when examining their birth records. (Averianova v. Mukasey, 12/10/07)
CA2 Says Abortion Not “Forced” if Officials Unaware of Pregnancy
The court upheld the BIA’s finding that an abortion is not “forced” unless the harm for the refusal to abort would amount to persecution and that because the government was not aware of the pregnancy, there was no threatened harm. (Xia v. Mukasey, 12/7/07)
CA9 Upholds Adverse Credibility Finding and BIA’s Voluntary Departure Cut
The court held that substantial evidence supported the IJ’s credibility determination due to inconsistencies. The court also upheld the BIA’s reduction in voluntary departure from 90 to 30 days finding that 90 days was statutorily impermissible. (Rivera v. Mukasey, 12/7/07)
CA2 Finds Asylum Applicant’s Testimony Inherently Implausible
The court held that a finding of implausibility must be based on more than bald speculation and that the IJ permissibly relied on testimony and record facts to infer that Petitioner’s story was implausible. (Yan v. Mukasey, 12/4/07)
CA8 Joins Other Circuits Holding Successive Asylum Application Requires MTR
The court, like its sister circuits, upheld that the BIA conclusion that an asylum applicant under a final order of removal must successfully reopen his case in order to pursue an untimely or successive asylum application under INA §208(a)(2)(D). (Zheng v. Mukasey, 12/4/07)
Stakeholder/USCIS Q & As (12/4/07)
The Q & As address I-192s and fee waivers, NTAs, adjustment from U and T status, EADs for Liberians with TPS, use of previously captured biometric data, religious workers, receipting delays for N-400s, material support, translator SIV visas, asylee adjustments and other matters.
More Information from USCIS Regarding Security Check Changes
E-mail from USCIS regarding the changes recently made in the DHS/FBI name check processes.
Secretary Chertoff Advises of Changes in FBI Name Check Clearance Process
In a meeting with AILA and other organizations, DHS Secretary Chertoff indicated that USCIS and the FBI are changing parts of the name check process, with the expected result that a large proportion of the backlog should be cleared within six months.
Authority of Asylum Officers to Retain Fraudulent Documents
Memo from Lynden Melmed, USCIS Chief Counsel, regarding asylum officers’ authority to retain fraudulent and fraudulently obtained documents for the purpose of determining authenticity.
CA2 Says No Jurisdiction to Review Timeliness of Asylum
The court reversed its previous decision and held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination on the timeliness of Petitioner’s asylum application. (Liu v. INS, 11/30/07)