Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA1 Finds BIA Erred in Overlooking Critical Evidence in Support of Dominican Petitioner’s Claims for Asylum Relief
Finding that BIA had failed to grapple with the serious nature of the threats the Dominican petitioner had received on account of his political opinion, the court held that BIA’s reasoning was inadequate to support a finding of no past persecution. (Rodríguez-Villar v. Barr, 7/11/19)
CA9 Says Battery with Injury in Violation of California Penal Code §243(d) Is a Crime of Violence
The court affirmed a sentencing determination by the district court, holding that battery resulting in serious bodily injury in violation of California Penal Code §243(d) qualifies as a crime of violence as defined in United States Sentencing Guidelines. (United States v. Perez, 7/11/19)
CA7 Upholds Denial of Motion to Reopen Where IJ Personally Served Petitioner with Notice
Where the IJ had personally served petitioner with notice of his removal hearing and had warned him about the consequences of failing to appear, the court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in affirming the denial of petitioner’s motion to reconsider. (Vyloha v. Barr, 7/10/19)
Senators Send Letter to DHS and DOD on Parole in Place (PIP) Program
On 7/10/19, 22 senators sent a letter to DHS and DOD opposing the proposed termination of the parole in place (PIP) program that protects military families from removal, stating, "ending this important program is cruel, inhumane and will result in separating military families."
Department of the Treasury Notice on Immigration Bond Interest Rates
Department of the Treasury notice that for the period beginning 7/1/19 and ending 9/30/19, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bond interest rate is 2.37 per centum per annum. (84 FR 32835, 7/9/19)
CA1 Remands Ghanaian Petitioner’s Asylum Claims Due to Ambiguities in BIA’s Decision
The court remanded to BIA for further explanation of its denial of the motion to reopen, holding that BIA had failed to make clear whether it accepted that petitioner had suffered past domestic abuse, which would give rise to a presumption of future persecution. (Twum v. Barr, 7/9/19)
CA5 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Former Salvadoran Police Officer Who Received Threats from Barrio 18 Gang
The court held that BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider because supporting authority was wholly absent from his motion, and found that the evidence did not compel a past or future persecution finding. (Cruz, et al. v. Barr, 7/9/19, amended 9/6/19)
CA6 Remands Motion to Reopen of Indigenous Land-Rights Activist in Guatemala Based on Changed Country Conditions
The court reversed and remanded, finding that the BIA failed to properly evaluate the petitioner’s undisputed, reasonably specific evidence and that it applied the wrong legal standards with respect to his motion to reopen based on changed country conditions. (Pablo Lorenzo v. Barr, 7/9/19)
BIA Holds Changed Circumstances Need Not Occur Before Asylum Application Is Filed
Unpublished BIA decision holds that changed circumstances need not occur before an asylum application is filed to qualify for the exception to the one-year filing deadline. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of J-R-F-F-, 7/9/19)
CA2 Remands Where Record Failed to Support BIA’s Inconsistency Findings
Vacating the removal order and remanding, the court held that the BIA erred by mistaking two discrepancies in the wording of the Nepali petitioner’s testimony as inconsistencies upon which the agency partly based an adverse credibility finding. (Gurung v. Barr, 7/8/19)
CA8 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Mexican Petitioner Who Asserted She Was Trapped in Abusive Relationship
The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s determination that the Mexican petitioner did not experience past persecution or have a well-founded fear of future persecution from either of her ex-domestic partners. (Wences Godinez v. Barr, 7/8/19)
CRS Releases Report on ICE’s Alternatives to Detention Programs
CRS released a report on ICE’s Alternatives to Detention (ATD) programs—Intensive Supervision Appearance Program III (ISAP III) and the Family Case Management Program (FCMP). The report includes data on active participants in each program, ICE caseload, and program evaluations.
Practice Advisory: Constitutional Challenges to Mandatory Immigration Detention After Nielsen v. Preap
The ACLU and advocates provide a practice advisory on the constitutional challenges to mandatory immigration detention after Nielsen v. Preap that authorizes ICE to impose mandatory detention any time after an individual’s predicate criminal offense.
CA9 Defers to Cortes Medina to Hold That California Conviction for Indecent Exposure Is a CIMT
Denying the petition for review, the court deferred to the BIA’s decision in Matter of Cortes Medina, which held that a conviction for indecent exposure under California Penal Code §314(1) is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Betansos v. Barr, 7/5/19)
CA8 Upholds BIA’s Denial of Motion to Reopen Based on Claim of Lack of Notice
The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner’s motion to reopen his 1994 in absentia deportation proceedings based on a claim of lack of notice. (Pinos Gonzalez v. Barr, 7/5/19)
BIA Terminates Removal Proceedings After Finding Conviction for Theft in Texas Was Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that respondent’s conviction for theft in Texas under Texas Penal Code §31.03(a) was not a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and that Matter of Diaz-Lizarraga should not be applied retroactively. Courtesy of Imran Mirza. (Matter of Herrera, 7/5/19)
Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients that Have Been Apprehended by ICE
AILA provides a practice pointer on best practices and tips for effectively locating clients that have been apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief Concerning Judicial Deference
AILA and partners urge the Eleventh Circuit to reverse its judgment and submitted an amicus brief in Barton v. Barr on whether a lawfully admitted permanent resident who is not seeking admission to the United States can be “render[ed] inadmissible” for purposes of the stop-time rule.
BIA Grants Motion to Change Venue That Was Not Solely Due to Proximity to Immigration Court
Unpublished BIA decision grants motion to change venue to Boise where respondent lived closer to Salt Lake City but was willing to travel additional 30 miles to be represented by her existing attorney. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Mendez Perez, 7/3/19)
CA7 Finds BIA Properly Classified Illinois Controlled Substance Convictions as Aggravated Felonies
The court held that the petitioner’s drug convictions qualified as “illicit trafficking” aggravated felonies under INA §101(a)(43)(B) even though they did not involve remuneration, because they were punishable as felonies under the Controlled Substances Act. (Lopez Gamero v. Barr, 7/3/19)
CA7 Remands for a Second Time Withholding and CAT Claims of Former MS-13 Gang Member from El Salvador
The court held that the IJ and BIA must take fair notice of the corroboration found in the evidence that the petitioner had submitted and take that corroboration into account in evaluating his withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT) claims. (Arrazabal v. Barr, 7/3/19)
ICE Announces the Removal of 37 Cambodian Nationals
ICE announced that 37 Cambodian nationals were repatriated in accordance with their final removal orders. ICE noted that removals to Cambodia increased 279 percent from FY2017 to FY2018 and that there are approximately 1,900 Cambodian nationals in the United States with final orders of removal.
EOIR Final Rule on Administrative Review Procedures
EOIR final rule to amend the regulations regarding the administrative review procedures of the BIA. The rule is effective 9/3/19. (84 FR 31463, 7/2/19)
EOIR 30-Day Extension of Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to Forms EOIR-42A and EOIR-42B
EOIR 30-day extension of a comment period originally announced at 84 FR 17891 on 4/26/19 on proposed changes to Forms EOIR-42A and EOIR-42B. Comments are now due 8/1/19. (84 FR 31627, 7/2/19)
AILA: AG Attempts Power Grab over Immigration Appeals
The administration published a rule which would authorize the attorney general (AG) “to singlehandedly designate Board of Immigration Appeals decisions as precedent—and do so literally overnight, bypassing the necessary legal procedures and without any checks and balances.”