Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
CA1 Concludes NTA Omitting Date and Time of Initial Removal Hearing Did Not Strip Immigration Court of Jurisdiction
The court denied the petition for review, holding that the petitioner’s Notice to Appear (NTA) was effective to commence removal proceedings in the immigration court, notwithstanding the absence of a date and time for his removal hearing. (Batista Ferreira v. Barr, 9/18/19)
TRAC Report Finds that Immigration Court’s Active Backlog Has Surpassed One Million
A TRAC report found that the immigration court’s active backload of cases has passed one million. Through the end of August 2019, the backlog was 1,007,155. A total of 384,977 new cases were filed in the first 11 months of FY2019. About 10 percent of these new filings were MPP cases.
EOIR Releases Immigration Court Video Advisals
EOIR released the prerecorded video advisals that it has begun using in some immigration courts. The videos are in English and Spanish and targeted separately to detained and non-detained individuals. EOIR has replaced interpreters at some master calendar hearings with these video advisals.
OSC Takes Disciplinary Action Against Former Immigration Judge for Hatch Act Violation
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) announced that Carmene “Zsa Zsa” DePaolo, a former immigration judge, had been fined $1,000 with a 30-month debarment from federal service for violating the Hatch Act from the bench. DePaolo was found to have made partisan statements during a hearing.
CRS Report Provides Legal Overview of Immigration Detention
CRS released a report providing an overview of immigration detention. The report lays out the legal and historical background of detention, the statutory framework that provides for detention, and legal issues concerning DHS’s detention powers, including indefinite detention and detention of minors.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Ecuadorian Petitioner Who Said He Was Confused by IJ’s Questioning
The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s affirmance of the denial of asylum, finding that the record provided ample support for the IJ’s conclusion that the petitioner’s statements were inconsistent and that his explanation was implausible. (Loja-Paguay v. Barr, 9/16/19)
FAQs on Military Parole in Place and Deferred Action
Military Parole in Place (PIP) provides parole on a case-by-case basis to certain undocumented family members of active duty members of the armed forces and veterans. Learn more about PIP and deferred action, the warnings that the programs will end, and the potential impact of ending these benefits.
BIA Terminates Proceedings Under Matter of Stockwell
Unpublished BIA decision grants interlocutory appeal and terminates proceedings against respondent whose conditional LPR status was terminated but who later adjusted status under Matter of Stockwell, 20 I&N Dec. 309 (BIA 1991). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Loayza, 9/16/19)
ICE Issues Purported Fact Sheet on Things to Know about Immigration Enforcement
ICE issued a news release on six things to know about immigration enforcement, including the consequences of interfering with an ICE officer’s duties, raids, sanctuary policies, immigration detainers, and the Privacy Act.
Fact Sheet on Seeking Release from Immigration Detention
The American Immigration Council released a fact sheet providing a brief overview of the process individuals must undergo to seek release from immigration detention.
CA5 Finds Petitioner’s Texas Drug Delivery Conviction Rendered Him Removable
The court held that the petitioner’s Texas conviction for possession of meth with intent to deliver was an offense “relating to a controlled substance” as defined in the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), thus rendering him removable under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II). (Padilla v. Barr, 9/12/19)
DHS Acting Secretary Issues Letter on Protecting DHS Law Enforcement Partners
In a letter, DHS Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan noted that individuals who pursue violent resistance against ICE will be arrested and referred to DOJ for prosecution. McAleenan noted that he has asked the Federal Protective Service to present a detailed plan for securing ICE facilities nationwide.
Sign-On Letter to Members of Congress on FY2020 DHS Spending Bill
On 9/12/19, AILA and other organizations signed on to a letter urging cuts to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)’s budget for detention, enforcement, and border militarization and to terminate DHS’s authority to transfer and reprogram funds.
BIA Remands to Consider Whether Permanent Bar Applies to Respondent Who Was Removed Unlawfully
Unpublished BIA decision remands for further consideration of whether respondent is inadmissible under INA 212(a)(9)(C)(i) in light of testimony that he was removed without a hearing before an IJ before he illegally reentered. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Valdivia-Muro, 9/12/19)
BIA Holds New Jersey Burglary Statutes Are Not CIMTs
Unpublished BIA decision holds that second and third degree burglary under N.J. Stat. Ann. 2C:18-2 are not CIMTs because statute does not require entry into a dwelling and intent to commit a CIMT offense. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Dargbeh, 9/11/19)
EOIR Provides AILA with Information on New Port Courts
EOIR provided AILA with responses to some of AILA’s questions on the operations at the new port courts in Laredo and Brownsville, Texas.
AILA Statement for House Hearing on Medical Deferred Action for Critically Ill Children
AILA submitted a statement to the House Oversight Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties for the September 11, 2019, hearing on the administration’s apparent revocation of medical deferred action for critically ill children.
CA2 Says INA’s “Changed Circumstances” Exception Allows Applicant to Raise Multiple Claims in Asylum Application
The court held that the plain language of INA §208(a)(2)(D) compels the conclusion that the “changed circumstances” exception to the one‐year deadline for filing an asylum application refers to the entire application, rather than the individual claim. (Yang v. Barr, 7/2/19, amended 9/11/19)
CA7 Says INA §242(a)(2)(A)’s Jurisdictional Bar Applied Where Petitioner Had Withdrawn Application for Admission
The court affirmed dismissal of the case for lack of jurisdiction under INA §242(a)(2)(A), finding that the jurisdictional bar still applied because an “order of removal” refers to both an order to remove and an order that a noncitizen is removable. (Odei, et al. v. DHS, et al., 9/10/19)
CA5 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Honduran Woman Who Claimed She Was Unable to Leave Her Relationship
The court held that substantial evidence supported BIA’s finding that petitioner had failed to show that she was harmed by her ex-boyfriend on account of her membership in the particular social group of Honduran women unable to leave their relationships. (Gonzales-Veliz v. Barr, 9/10/19)
IJ Finds Respondent’s Conviction for Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree in New York Is Not a CIMT
The IJ found that the respondent’s conviction for grand larceny in the fourth degree in violation of New York law was not a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) pursuant to the Second Circuit’s decision in Obeya v. Sessions. Courtesy of Alexander Segal. (Matter of K-R-, 9/10/19)
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order Due To Faulty NTA and Service Thereof
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia order because NTA did not contain warnings about addresses changes and the hearing notice was served on an attorney who previously withdrew from the case. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Flores-Martinez, 9/10/19)
CA1 Finds NTA’s Failure to Include Time and Date of Removal Hearing Was Not a Jurisdictional Flaw
The court held that the Supreme Court’s decision in Pereira v. Sessions did not invalidate the petitioner’s Notice to Appear (NTA), even though the NTA failed to include the date and time of the petitioner’s removal hearing. (Goncalves Pontes v. Barr, 9/6/19)
EOIR Releases ECAS Handbooks and Manuals
Hoppock Law Firm obtained via FOIA the handbooks and manuals that identify how the EOIR Courts & Appeals System (ECAS) initiative and database work.
Groups File Lawsuit Challenging Legitimacy of Acting USCIS Director to Issue Several Asylum Directives
Several groups filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Trump administration to challenge a set of asylum directives issued by Acting USCIS Director Ken Cuccinelli, alleging that the directives violate the U.S. Constitution and federal law. (L.M.-M., et al. v. Cuccinelli, et al., 9/6/19)