AILA provides a series of 12 charts comparing President Biden’s accomplishments 100 days after entering office with the comprehensive recommendations AILA presented to the president.View All
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 18080834 | Dated August 8, 2018
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the National Association of Immigration Judges (NAIJ) accused the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), part of the Department of Justice (DOJ), of violating the Constitution, federal statute and the NAIJ's union contract by stripping cases away from a judge based on the administration's desired outcome.
"This grievance puts the spotlight on how fundamentally compromised our immigration court system has become," said Jeremy McKinney, AILA Treasurer. He added, "The Attorney General is taking advantage of the structural flaws of the immigration court system-which operates directly under his authority-to dramatically reshape federal immigration law and undermine the integrity of due process as guaranteed in the Constitution. It is impermissible to remove a judge from a case because the Attorney General or EOIR management disagrees with the outcome reached by the judge. The administration has given a 'my way or the highway' directive to immigration judges that illustrates exactly why the immigration courts must be independent of the Department of Justice. That's why AILA has launched a nationwide campaign calling upon Congress to pass legislation that creates an immigration court system in the form of an Article I court."
The grievance filed by NAIJ is just one example of how EOIR has undermined judicial independence. EOIR has also announced that it will impose new case completion quotas on immigration judges which will compromise the fairness and consistency in court decisions. In addition, EOIR issued a memorandum pressuring immigration judges to deny continuances, which are most often requested so that a respondent can find an attorney. Finally, Attorney General Sessions has already certified four Board of Immigration Appeals cases to himself and issued two precedent decisions that will further undermine due process. The administration's aggressive and unwise policies demonstrate why the Immigration Court must be restructured into an Article I court that is independent of the Department of Justice. To guarantee fundamental fairness and due process in every case, the immigration courts cannot operate under the control of the agency that is responsible for the prosecution and enforcement of immigration cases.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 18080834.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-2021
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.