Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
5,076 - 5,100 of 13,023 collection items
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Reopens Proceedings Based on Unpublished BIA Decision

Unpublished BIA decision reopens proceedings following submission of unpublished decision that found 35 Pa. Cons. Stat. 78-113(a)(30) not to be an aggravated felony drug trafficking crime. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Watkins, 6/9/17)

6/9/17 AILA Doc. No. 18051641. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Florida Grand Theft Is Not a CIMT

Unpublished BIA decision holds that grand theft under Fla. Stat. 812.014 is not a CIMT because it applies to temporary takings or appropriations of property. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ngo, 6/8/17)

6/8/17 AILA Doc. No. 18051035. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions: Supreme Court Limits Reach of Aggravated Felony “Sexual Abuse of a Minor” Ground and Provides Support on Other

The National Immigration Project and the Immigrant Defense Project provides a practice advisory on Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, including suggested strategies and a sample motion to reconsider for cases affected by the decision, which should be filed by 6/29/17.

6/8/17 AILA Doc. No. 17061403. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Says Deferred Adjudication Under Virginia Code §18.2-251 Falls Within the Unambiguous Definition of a Conviction

The court denied the petition for review, holding that the petitioner’s 2005 criminal proceedings under Virginia Code §18.2-251 for possession of cocaine fell squarely within the plain text of INA §101(a)(48)(A), and thus constituted a conviction. (Payan Jaquez v. Sessions, 6/8/17)

6/8/17 AILA Doc. No. 17071006. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Says Noncitizens Subject to Reinstatement of a Removal Order Cannot Apply for Asylum

The court dismissed the petition for review, holding that because asylum is a form of discretionary relief, the petitioner, who was subject to a reinstated order of removal, lacked standing to challenge the federal regulations prohibiting him from applying for it. (Garcia v. Sessions, 6/8/17)

6/8/17 AILA Doc. No. 17071007. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Says Fleeing from Police Under California Vehicle Code §2800.2 Is Not Categorically a CIMT

The court held that petitioner’s conviction for fleeing from a police officer under California Vehicle Code §2800.2 was not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude, and thus that he was not statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. (Ramirez-Contreras v. Sessions, 6/8/17)

6/8/17 AILA Doc. No. 17070632. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

Sign-On Letter Calling on Members of Congress to Oppose the House Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act (H.R. 2213)

On 6/6/17, AILA joined 42 organizations in urging members of Congress to oppose the Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act (H.R. 2213), which would eliminate critical polygraph requirements for some U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) applicants.

6/6/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060730. Admissions & Border, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

AILA Issues Vote Recommendation on H.R. 2213

AILA urges members of Congress to vote NO on Representative Martha McSally’s (R-AZ) Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2017, which would allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to waive polygraph examination requirements for applicants.

6/6/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060630. Admissions & Border, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Federal Judge in Texas Finds County Policy of Honoring ICE Detainers Violated Plaintiff’s Rights

A district judge found that a Texas county’s policy of honoring ICE detainers violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a plaintiff who was held in county detention pursuant to an ICE detainer after his criminal charge was dismissed. (Trujillo Santoyo v. United States, 6/5/17)

6/5/17 AILA Doc. No. 17061263. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE eService Pilot- Dallas and St. Paul

ICE brochure announcing a voluntary 60-day pilot for ICE eService that begins on Monday, June 5, 2017, offering electronic service of documents between ICE OPLA offices and respondents or legal representatives. The pilot is only available for Dallas and St. Paul areas of responsibility.

6/5/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060531. Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

Sign-On Letter Calling on the Appropriations Committees to Reject the President’s “Enforcement Only” Budget Request

On 6/5/17, AILA joined 273 organizations in urging the Senate Appropriations Chairman Thad Cochran (R-MS) and Vice Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT); and House Appropriations Chairman Frelinghuysen (R-NJ) and Ranking Member Lowey (D-NY) to oppose President Trump’s “Enforcement Only” budget request.

6/5/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060660. Admissions & Border, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Vacates Discretionary Denial of Asylum Application

Unpublished BIA decision finds IJ erred in denying asylum application as a matter of discretion solely because respondent failed to seek asylum during two prior visits to United Kingdom. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of G-S-, 6/5/17)

6/5/17 AILA Doc. No. 18051037. Asylum & Refugees, Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Finds Tax Conviction Is Not an Aggravated Felony

Unpublished BIA decision holds that failure to collect or pay over a tax under 26 USC §7202 is not an aggravated felony because INA §101(a)(43)(M)(ii) applies only to offenses described in 26 USC §7201. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Corral, 6/2/17)

6/2/17 AILA Doc. No. 18051161. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Dismisses Appeal, Finding Respondent Did Not Establish Claim to Citizenship

The BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision and dismissed the respondent’s appeal, finding that the respondent did not show that proceedings must be instituted to revoke citizenship and did not establish his claim to citizenship. Matter of Falodun, 27 I&N Dec. 52 (BIA 2017)

6/2/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060202. Naturalization & Citizenship, Removal & Relief

OIG Releases Results from FY2016 Spot Inspections of ICE Family Detention Facilities

The Office of Inspector General released a report on its FY2016 spot inspections of three ICE family detention facilities in Leesport, PA and Dilley and Karnes, Texas, finding the facilities “clean, well-organized, and efficiently run.”

6/2/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060731. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Concludes Receipt of a Stolen Motor Vehicle Is Not an Aggravated Felony

The BIA dismissed DHS’s appeal and remanded, finding that a conviction for receipt of a stolen motor vehicle under South Dakota Codified Laws §32-4-5, which requires a “reason to believe” that the vehicle was stolen, was not an aggravated felony. Matter of Deang, 27 I&N Dec. 57 (BIA 2017)

6/2/17 AILA Doc. No. 17061635. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Fact Sheet: EOIR’s Fraud and Abuse Prevention Program

EOIR issued a fact sheet on its Fraud and Abuse Prevention Program in EOIR’s Office of the General Counsel, which is committed to identifying and combatting all forms of fraud, "in order to protect the integrity of EOIR’s immigration proceedings."

6/1/17 AILA Doc. No. 17062840. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Remands After Finding Conviction for Receipt of Stolen Property is Categorically An Aggravated Felony Offense

The BIA remanded after concluding that respondent’s conviction for receipt of stolen property is categorically an aggravated felony theft offense under INA §101(a)(43)(G) and that the IJ’s reliance on Lopez-Valencia was misplaced. Matter of Alday-Dominguez, 27 I&N Dec. 48 (BIA 2017)

6/1/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060131. Crimes, Removal & Relief

GAO Report: Actions Needed to Reduce Case Backlog and Address Long-Standing Management and Operational Challenges

The Government Accountability Office issued a report showing that the EOIR case backlog more than doubled from FY2006 through FY2015 primarily due to declining cases completed per year. GAO is making 11 recommendations to improve EOIR’s workforce planning, hiring, and analysis of continuance data.

6/1/17 AILA Doc. No. 17060260. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Supreme Court Rules “Sexual Abuse of a Minor” Requires Victim to Be Less Than 16 Years Old

In a unanimous decision, the Court found that in cases of statutory rape based solely on the ages of the participants, sexual abuse of a minor requires that the victim be younger than 16. Thus, the petitioner’s conduct was not an aggravated felony. (Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, 5/30/17)

5/30/17 AILA Doc. No. 17053036. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Attorney General Selected James McHenry as the Acting Director of EOIR

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has selected James McHenry as the acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). Acting Director McHenry first joined EOIR in 2003 through the Attorney General’s Honors Program and returned in 2016, when he was appointed as an ALJ for OCAHO.

5/30/17 AILA Doc. No. 17053038. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Judge Writes Concurrence Criticizing Government's Action in Removal Case

The court denied the petitioner’s request for a stay of removal due to a lack of authority to grant the stay. Judge Reinhardt wrote a concurrence calling the government’s action in the case “contrary to the values of this nation and its legal system.” (Magana Ortiz v. Sessions, 5/30/17)

5/30/17 AILA Doc. No. 17053136. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Substantial Evidence Supported BIA’s Finding That Petitioner Was a “Habitual Drunkard”

The en banc court denied the petition for review, concluding that petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to establish good moral character because, during the requisite period, he had been a “habitual drunkard.” (Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions, 5/30/17)

5/30/17 AILA Doc. No. 17071002. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Indiana Statute Is Not a Drug Trafficking Aggravated Felony

Unpublished BIA decision holds maintaining a common nuisance under Indiana Code 35-48-4-13(b)(1) as it existed in May 2016 is not an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(B). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Paul, 5/30/17)

5/30/17 AILA Doc. No. 18051162. Crimes, Removal & Relief
AILA Blog

Access to Counsel Should be Non-Negotiable

“Wait, you mean to tell me you are not allowed to contact a lawyer at the airport?“ That is a familiar response when I tell people of the lack of any protocol for allowing access to counsel to those who are coming into the United States from abroad. The fact is, when someone enters the […