Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
CA5 Barred from Reviewing §212(c) Reversal; Affirms BIA Removal Order
The court said it lacked jurisdiction to review the BIA’s reversal of an IJ grant of §212(c) relief. It also upheld the BIA’s act of ordering removal because, it concluded, the BIA was giving effect to the IJ’s original order of removability. (Delgado-Reynua v. Gonzales, 5/23/06)
CA3 Finds Jurisdiction to Review IJ’s Denial of Motion to Continue
The court held that INA §242(a)(2)(B)(ii) does not bar jurisdiction to review the IJ’s denial of a motion to continue because the authority to grant continuances is not “specified under [the relevant] subchapter” to be in the discretion of the AG. (Khan v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 5/22/06)
CA3 Finds Harsh Prison Conditions in Haiti Are Not Torture
The court held that the generalized allegations of prison conditions for criminal deportees in Haiti raised by Petitioner do not rise to the level of torture. (Francois v. Gonzales, 5/19/06)
CA5 Denies DHS Motion to Reconsider as Collateral Attack Barred by Res Judicata
The court held that DHS’s motion to reconsider was a collateral attack barred by res judicata. The DHS motion argued that the BIA did not have jurisdiction to grant the prior motion to reopen and terminate proceedings. (Guevara v. Gonzales, 5/19/06)
AILA Letter Strongly Supporting Brownback – Lieberman Amendment
Letter to Senators urging their support of the Brownback – Lieberman Amendment, the Secure and Safe Detention and Asylum Act. The amendment would provide important and needed protections for asylum seekers and help to ensure an effective and humane system of immigration detention.
ICE Opens Detention Center for Families
ICE announces the opening of a detention facility for families, and notes its intention to subject families to expedited removal.
ICE Memo with Field Guidance on Response to Law Enforcement Calls
ICE issued a memo with guidance to all Office of Investigations personnel on response to calls for service involving undocumented immigrants.
CA2 Finds IJ/BIA Erred in Not Determining Applicant’s Nationality
The court held that an applicant’s nationality is a threshold issue in determining eligibility for asylum and that the IJ and the BIA erred in failing to determine Petitioner’s nationality. (Wangchuck v. DHS, 5/15/06)
CA2 on Equitable Tolling of MTRs and Jurisdiction to Review Sua Sponte Decisions
The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in refusing to equitably toll the time period on motions to reopen and that it had no jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision not to reopen the case sua sponte. (Ali v. Gonzales, 5/12/06)
CA3 Finds BIA Erred in Not Reopening Due to Changed Conditions
The court found that the BIA committed an error of law when it held that Petitioners’ motion to reopen based on changed conditions was time barred under 8 CFR §1003.2(c)(3)(ii). (Filja v. Gonzales, 5/12/06)
CA2 Sets Time Limit for BIA to Issue “Social Group” Decision
Noting that the BIA has not decided whether affluent Guatemalans are a particular social group, the court remanded and gave the BIA 49 days to respond. (Ucelo-Gomez v. Gonzales, 5/9/06)
CA2 Affirms BIA’s Decision in Matter of Vargas
The court held that first degree manslaughter in violation of New York Penal Code §§125.20(1) or (2) is a crime of violence under 18 USC §18(b) and is therefore, an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(F). (Vargas-Sarmiento v. Gonzales, 5/8/06)
CA2 Finds Jurisdiction to Review VWP Asylum Claim
The court found jurisdiction to review the denial of Petitioner’s asylum claim even though her visa waiver case did not occur in a removal proceeding because the denial of her claim was the functional equivalent of a removal order. (Kanacevic v. INS, 5/5/06)
CA2 Rejects BIA’s Finding of Changed Circumstances in Mauritania
The court found that the BIA relied on an outdated DOS report, accepted the report’s general statements, did not make an individualized assessment of Petitioner’s situation, and failed to consider evidence contradicting the report. (Tambadou v. Gonzales, 5/3/06)
CA2 Says Presumption Arising from I-589 Signature Is Rebuttable
The court held that when challenging the accuracy of an asylum application signed under penalty of perjury, the IJ must evaluate the petitioner's explanations and determine whether the presumption under 8 CFR §208.3(c)(2) has been rebutted. (Pang v. BCIS, 5/3/06)
CA3 Finds BIA Mischaracterized Evidence and Remands Asylum Claim
The court found that the BIA mischaracterized the nature and degree of the threats faced by Petitioner and held that he established a well-founded fear in Guatemala. (Chavarria v. Gonzales, 5/3/06)
USCIS Memo on Disclosing Petitioners' Criminal Histories to Beneficiaries
A 5/3/06 memo from Robert Divine, USCIS Acting Deputy Director, addressing the concerns involved in disclosing certain information relating to petitioners' criminal histories to potential beneficiaries.
CA2 Upholds Adverse Credibility in Chinese Forced Abortion Case
The court upheld the adverse credibility finding where the material inconsistencies between Petitioner’s application and testimony were so self-evident, the IJ/BIA did not have to give Petitioner an opportunity to respond. (Ye v. Gonzales, 5/2/06)
CA8 Holds No INA §242(e)(2) Habeas Review of Reinstated Expedited Removal Order
The court held that the habeas corpus review of expedited removal orders provided by INA §242(e)(2) is not available when an expedited order is reinstated because INA §241(a)(5) bars review of the underlying order of removal. (Ochoa-Carillo v. Gonzales, 5/1/06)
CA7 Holds No Jurisdiction to Review Denial of Motion to Reopen
The court held, for purposes of INA §242(a)(2)(D), the IJ’s application of the continuous physical presence standard to the facts was not a “question of law” and no due process claim existed because extreme hardship is a discretionary element. (Cevilla v. Gonzales, 5/1/06)
Attorney General Disapproves CAT Relief for Mentally Ill Respondent
The AG found that the mentally ill pre se respondent did not show eligibility for CAT as evidence did not establish that each step in the hypothetical chain of events leading to torture is more likely than not to happen. Matter of J-F-F-, 23 I&N 912 (AG 2006)
CA3 Overturns IJ’s Credibility Finding in Scathing Opinion
The court found that substantial evidence did not support the IJ’s conclusion that Petitioner’s father was alive noting that the IJ relied on death certificates that he had excluded from evidence and that he failed to address newspaper articles regarding the death. (Shah v. Gonzales, 4/28/06)
Stories of ICE Sweeps--True or Not? (Revised 4/27/06)
Reports of new enforcement activity against employers and alleged undocumented workers, including sweeps, raids and other activity may be rumor.
DHS Unveils New Interior Enforcement Strategy
ICE news release outlines the department's new strategy to expand interior enforcement efforts. The new enforcement plan, which is the second phase of DHS's Secure Border Initiative, will target employers of undocumented aliens, immigration violators inside this country, and criminal networks.
USCIS Seeks Comments on Application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal (Form I-589)
USCIS seeks comments on Form I-589, Application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal. This is a revision of a currently approved information collection. Comments due by 6/20/06 (71 FR 20711, 4/21/06)