Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
AILA, the American Immigration Council, and 147 Partners Send Letter to Biden on Funding for Legal Representation Programs
AILA, the American Immigration Council, and 147 partners sent a letter to Biden and Congress requesting an increase in funding to expand legal representation for people in removal proceedings.
Four Years of Profound Change: Immigration Policy during the Trump Presidency
The Migration Policy Institute provides an overview of policies at different points during the Trump Administration, chronicling the immigration actions, large and small, that President Donald Trump and his Administration took from January 20, 2017, through January 20, 2021.
CRS Provides Insight Report on Dreamers
CRS provided an Insight report on Dreamers. The report explains the options currently available to Dreamers once they reach age 21, estimates the population of “legal Dreamers,” and outlines selected congressional action that could affect "legal Dreamers.”
BIA Dismisses Appeal After Finding §714.1 of Iowa Code Is Divisible with Regard to Type of Theft
BIA found Iowa Code is divisible with respect to whether a violation of it involved theft by taking without consent or by fraud or deceit, permitting use of modified categorical approach to determine if a violation involved aggravated felony theft. Matter of Koat, 28 I&N Dec. 450 (BIA 2022)
CA8 Upholds BIA’s Decision Denying Motion to Reopen Even Though Petitioner Made a Prima Facie Case for Relief
The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s successive motion to reopen, and that the BIA did not deprive the petitioner of a constitutionally protected liberty interest in declining to reopen proceedings sua sponte. (Urrutia Robles v. Garland, 1/26/22)
CA11 Finds Petitioner Failed to Prove That Florida’s Cocaine Statute Covers More Substances Than the Federal Statute
The court held that the petitioner, who had been convicted of cocaine possession under Florida law, had failed to show that Florida’s definition of cocaine covers more than its federal counterpart, and thus upheld the BIA’s denial of cancellation of removal. (Chamu v. Att’y Gen., 1/26/22)
CA5 Finds Proposed PSG of Honduran Women Unable to Leave Domestic Relationship Was Not Cognizable
The court concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in holding that the petitioner’s proposed particular social group (PSG)— “Honduran women who are unable to leave their domestic relationships”—was not legally cognizable. (Jaco v. Garland, 10/27/21, amended 1/26/22)
CA9 Declines to Rehear Velasquez-Gaspar v. Garland En Banc
The court issued an order denying the rehearing en banc of Velasquez-Gaspar v. Garland, in which the court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that the Guatemalan government could have protected the petitioner had she reported her abuse. (Velasquez-Gaspar v. Garland, 1/25/22)
CA7 Says BIA Legally Erred by Considering Arguments That the Government First Raised on Appeal
The court held that the BIA legally erred by considering arguments that the government did not present to the IJ, and that the BIA engaged in impermissible factfinding on the conditions in Kosovo, rendering its decision to deny remand an abuse of discretion. (Osmani v. Garland, 1/24/22)
CA7 Upholds Asylum Denial to Christian Chinese Petitioner Who Acknowledged Discrepancies in Her Asylum Application
The court held that the record supported the IJ’s and BIA’s conclusion that the Chinese Christian petitioner did not meet her burden of establishing her eligibility for asylum given the discrepancies in her testimony and the lack of corroborative evidence. (Dai v. Garland, 1/24/22)
DHS Releases Privacy Impact Assessment for HSI Surveillance Technologies
ICE conducted a Privacy Impact Assessment of HSI’s use of several surveillance technologies, including body wire, video surveillance, and location tracking. These technologies are used by HSI to investigate human smuggling and trafficking and immigration fraud, among other crimes.
EOIR Invites Stakeholders to Online Screening of Model Hearing Program
As part of the Access EOIR initiative, EOIR invites stakeholders to an online viewing session of its Model Hearing Program event on February 3, 2022, from 2 pm to 4 pm (ET). The video will cover MHP, protection under CAT, and more. RSVP to EngagewithEOIR@usdoj.gov by February 2, 2022, at 5 pm.
CA9 Applies Circumstance-Specific Approach to Find That Amount of Marijuana in Petitioner’s Possession Exceeded 30 Grams
The court held that the circumstance-specific approach applies to the 30-gram limit of INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i)’s personal-use exception, and that the circumstances established that the amount of marijuana in petitioner’s possession exceeded 30 grams. (Bogle v. Garland, 6/23/21, amended 12/29/21)
AILA Submits Statement for Congressional Hearing on Immigration Courts
AILA submitted a statement entitled “Why America needs an Independent Immigration Court System” to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship for its hearing “For the Rule of Law, an Independent Immigration Court.”
BIA Reinstates Removal Proceedings After Finding §2C:35-10(a)(1) of New Jersey Statutes Annotated Is Divisible with Respect to Specific Substance Poss
BIA found §2C:35-10(a)(1) of New Jersey Statutes Annotated is divisible and convictions can be reviewed under the modified categorical approach to determine whether the specific substance possessed is a controlled substance under federal law. Matter of Laguerre, 28 I&N Dec. 437 (BIA 2022)
Multilingual Instructional Videos on Various Immigration Processes
Innovation Law Lab shares instructional videos in a variety of languages, including Central American indigenous languages, explaining different immigration processes. Videos cover topics such as the difference between ICE, ISAP, and the immigration court and what are biometrics, among other items.
BIA Denies Motions to Terminate and to Reopen and Rescind In Absentia Removal Order, Distinguishes Niz-Chavez
The BIA held that a respondent served with a noncompliant notice to appear receives sufficient written notice to support an in absentia removal order when properly served with a notice of hearing specifying the time and place of the hearing. Matter of Laparra, 28 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 2022)
CA1 Says Conviction in Rhode Island for Driving a Motor Vehicle Without Consent Is Not Categorically a Theft Offense
The court held that the petitioner’s conviction for driving a motor vehicle without consent of the owner or lessee under Rhode Island General Laws (RIGL) §31-9-1 did not constitute a categorical aggravated felony theft offense. (Da Graca v. Garland, 1/18/22)
TRAC Reports on Immigration Court Backlog
TRAC released a report on the immigration court backlog, finding that pending cases at the end of December 2021 reached 1,596,193—the largest in history. The report includes information on quarterly increases in the backlog and recent accelerations in rate of growth.
CA5 Finds Petitioner Removable Under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(ii) for Having Been Convicted of Two CIMTs After Admission
The court concluded that res judicata did not bar the removal proceedings, deadly conduct was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and petitioner was admitted to the United States when he adjusted to lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. (Diaz Esparza v. Garland, 1/17/22)
DHS Reports on Persons Enrolled in MPP in December 2021
DHS released a report on initial enforcement outcomes for persons enrolled in MPP from December 6, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The report includes information on fear screenings, returns and disenrollements, non-refoulement interviews, and more.
Practice Alert: EOIR Provides WebEx Links for Specific Courts and Immigration Judges
AILA alerts members that EOIR has added links for the “WebEx Information” for specific courts and immigration judges to its Operational Status Map as it implements remote hearings pursuant to its earlier January 10, 2022, announcement in response to the recent surge of COVID-19 cases.
CA9 Holds That BIA Sufficiently Complied with Notice Requirements Applicable to a Minor in Immigration Proceedings
The court rejected the petitioner’s contention that, because she was actually a minor when she was released on her own recognizance without notice of her hearing to a reasonable adult, the notice provided her was inadequate. (Jimenez-Sandoval v. Garland, 1/13/22)
CA6 Finds Petitioner Forfeited Ineffective Assistance Claim Because He Failed to Comply with Third Lozada Requirement
The court held that BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance, finding that Matter of Lozada requires more than a statement that the noncitizen is “not interested” in filing a bar complaint.(Guzman-Torralva v. Garland, 1/13/22)
Removal Proceedings in the Time of COVID
Jonathan Willmoth reflects on the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on court proceedings and the Biden administration's efforts to expand prosecutorial discretion, two areas he looks forward to learning more about at the upcoming AILA Virtual Midwinter Conference.