Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Practice Alert: Respondent and Counsel Not Required to Be in Same Location During Remote Hearings
The ICE/EOIR Committee provides an update from EOIR in response to its announcement that starting on 1/10/22, it has postponed non-detained, non-represented cases hearings due to COVID. Respondents are not required to be in the same location as counsel.
EOIR Announces Suspension of All Standing Orders Through January 31, 2022
EOIR announced that the Chief Immigration Judge has suspended all standing orders through January 31, 2022, because of operational changes due to the ongoing pandemic. The EOIR website will be updated with information on the agency’s operation.
CA5 Says Government Rebutted Presumption of Future Persecution Based on Guatemalan Petitioner’s Sexual Orientation and Identity
The court held that because petitioner, who was homosexual and identified as transgender, had said that she could probably safely relocate in Guatemala, the BIA did not err in finding that the government had rebutted the presumption of future persecution. (Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 1/10/22)
CA9 Finds Petitioner’s Conviction for Arson in California Was Not an Aggravated Felony
The court held that arson in violation of California Penal Code (CPC) §451 was not a categorical match to its federal counterpart, and thus that the petitioner’s conviction under CPC §451(b) was not an aggravated felony that rendered him removable. (Togonon v. Garland, 1/10/22)
CA1 Remands for Reconsideration of Adverse Credibility Determination Where IJ and BIA Relied on Flawed “Gang Assessment Database”
On rehearing en banc, the court granted the petition for review, finding that IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence, where the IJ had relied on a “Gang Assessment Database” that contained serious flaws. (Diaz Ortiz v. Garland, 1/10/22)
CA4 Finds BIA Abused Its Discretion in Denying Continuance to Petitioner with Pending U Visa Application
Where the petitioner had a pending U visa application, the court held that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance, finding that the BIA had departed from precedential opinions in holding that he had failed to show good cause. (Garcia Cabrera v. Garland, 1/6/22)
Get Ready for Mandatory E-Filing with EOIR, Starting February 2022
EOIR has announced e-filing will become mandatory for all lawyers practicing before EOIR effective February 11, 2022. Mandatory e-filing comes with important changes that can help you get the work done, if you are ready for them. Get prepared with this tip from the Practice & Professionalism Center.
Department of the Treasury Notice on Interest Rate for Immigration Bonds
Department of the Treasury notice that for the period beginning 1/1/22, and ending 3/31/22, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bond interest rate is 0.06 per centum per annum. (87 FR 802, 1/6/22)
CA4 Finds That “Prosecution Witnesses” Is Not a PSG
The court agreed with the BIA that the Honduran petitioner’s proposed particular social group (PSG) of “prosecution witnesses” lacked particularity, and found no error in the BIA’s decision upholding the IJ’s adverse credibility finding as to petitioner. (Herrera-Martinez v. Garland, 1/5/22)
CA5 Upholds Withholding of Removal Denial to Petitioner with Felony Assault Conviction
The court affirmed the BIA’s determination that petitioner’s felony assault conviction was a particularly serious crime rendering him ineligible for withholding of removal, because he had failed to show how the alleged errors compelled reversal. (Aviles-Tavera v. Garland, 1/4/22)
CA5 Withdraws Prior Opinion and Issues Substitute Opinion in Parada-Orellana v. Garland
The court denied the petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing, withdrew its prior panel opinion of 8/6/21, and held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion by applying an incorrect legal standard when it denied petitioner's motion to reopen. (Parada-Orellana v. Garland, 1/3/22)
DHS OIG Report on ICE’s Medical Center at Irwin County Detention Center
DHS’s OIG reported that the medical processes and communication protocols at Irwin County Detention Center need improvement, as facility employees, ICE staff, and detainees were not kept consistently informed of COVID-19 protocols. DHS OIG made five recommendations; four are now closed.
Custody Redetermination Hearings and Material Change in Circumstances
AILA Law Journal author Matthew Boles shares some insights about researching and writing about custody redetermination and why he hopes his AILA Law Journal article on the subject can help other practitioners across the country advocate in front of immigration judges.
CA9 Declines to Rehear Bogle v. Garland En Banc
The court issued an order denying the rehearing en banc of Bogle v. Garland, in which the court held that the circumstance-specific approach applies to the 30-gram limit of INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i)’s personal-use exception. (Bogle v. Garland, 12/29/21)
Third Delay of Effective Date of Final Rule on Pandemic-Related Security Bars to Asylum and Withholding of Removal
USCIS and EOIR interim final rule further delaying until 12/31/22 the effective date of the final rule “Security Bars and Processing” (85 FR 84160, 12/23/20). Comments on the extension of the effective date as well as the possibility of a further extension are due 2/28/22. (86 FR 73615, 12/28/21)
CA1 Vacates District Court’s Class-Wide Injunction in Case Challenging Bond Procedures Under INA §236A
In a class action challenging bond procedures used to detain noncitizens during the pendency of removal proceedings under INA §236A, the court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to issue an injunction in favor of the class. (Pereira Brito, et al. v. Garland, et al., 12/28/21)
AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief on the Interpretation of Child Endangerment
AILA and partners submitted a brief in Marquez v. Garland arguing that the Board’s interpretation reading of child abuse, child neglect, and child abandonment encompasses negligent child-endangerment and is overboard; thereby, the court should grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
CLINIC Provides Comparison Table of Prior and Current Versions of EOIR’s Immigration Court Practice Manual
CLINIC provides a comparison table that briefly summarizes some of the key changes between the prior version of the EOIR Immigration Court Practice Manual, published in February 2008, and the current version, released in December 2020.
CA3 Reinstates IJ’s Grant of CAT Relief to Guatemalan Petitioner Where BIA Exceeded Its Proper Scope of Review
Where the BIA had reversed the IJ’s decision granting the Guatemalan petitioner Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief, the court held that BIA erred by inserting itself into the factfinder role and disagreeing with the IJ’s weighing of the evidence. (Arreaga-Bravo v. Att’y Gen., 12/23/21)
Practice Alert: EOIR Provides Rotating IJ Schedules Through Regional Public Information Officers
EOIR has resumed providing rotating schedules for immigration judges through its regional public information officers.
CA3 Finds Congolese Asylum Seeker’s Fear of Returning to the DRC Was Objectively Reasonable
Granting the petition for review, the court held that the record compelled a finding that the risks petitioner faced upon return to the Democratic Republic of the Congo were sufficient to give rise to an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution. (Nsimba v. Att’y Gen., 12/22/21)
CRS Provides Year-End Report on Apprehensions and Expulsions at the Southwest Border
CRS provided the FY2021 report on apprehensions and expulsions at the southwest border. The report includes current border enforcement policies, encounters by demographic category, encounters by country of citizenship, and more.
CA9 Holds That “An Offense” in INA §240A(b)(1)(C) Includes “Multiple Criminal Convictions” Described in INA §212(a)(2)(B)
Denying the petition for review, the court held that the phrase “an offense” in the cancellation of removal statute at INA §240A(b)(1)(C) includes the “[m]ultiple criminal convictions” described in INA §212(a)(2)(B) that render a noncitizen inadmissible.(Ramirez-Medina v. Garland, 12/22/21)
CA9 Concludes That Petitioner’s Two Arizona Convictions for Marijuana-Related Offenses Were Not CIMTs
The court held that Arizona Revised Statutes §13-3405(A)(4) was overbroad and divisible and that petitioner’s convictions, which concerned categories in the statute involving the smallest quantity of marijuana, were not crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMTs). (Walcott v. Garland, 12/22/21)
CA9 Finds That BIA Sufficiently Considered Petitioner’s CAT Claim and Provided Adequate Rationale for Its Rejection
The court held that the BIA had sufficiently considered the relevant record evidence regarding the petitioner’s claim for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and had provided an adequate rationale for rejecting that claim. (Rodriguez-Jimenez v. Garland, 12/21/21)